Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

You said yourself we are in a post Constitutional period. There’s no sense having this conversation.
Definitely no sense in it with someone who thinks there were lots of people in a lot is stronger evidence than known gang tatoos and CIs reporting.

Can’t top that one!
 
It’s going to look worse and worse for the people defending this animal.

Imagine spending so much energy on this
 
If the constitution defends non citizens like this then maybe it’s time to ignore tbe constitution altogether.
You’ve made this view abundantly clear already, even in the face of the courts saying it does in fact do that.
 
You’ve made this view abundantly clear already, even in the face of the courts saying it does in fact do that.

Screw the courts - screw the consitition if the position is this animal deserves “due process”
 
Outrage away - majority of Americans would think it’s absolutely ridiculous this animal deserves anhtjjg but to rot in an El Salvador prison.
In the immediate aftermath of the September 11 attacks, the USA PATRIOT Act, signed into law in late 2001, enjoyed widespread public support. This strong backing, primarily fueled by fear and a desire to enhance national security, persisted into 2002. However, as time passed and the act's provisions became more widely known, concerns about civil liberties and potential abuses of power began to emerge, leading to a gradual shift in public opinio
 
In the immediate aftermath of the September 11 attacks, the USA PATRIOT Act, signed into law in late 2001, enjoyed widespread public support. This strong backing, primarily fueled by fear and a desire to enhance national security, persisted into 2002. However, as time passed and the act's provisions became more widely known, concerns about civil liberties and potential abuses of power began to emerge, leading to a gradual shift in public opinio

Nobody is cheering on regular illegals be sent here. Nobody is blindly accusing people of being animals deserving of this.

Originally the claims were no evidnece and be was an upstanding man. The comparison to the patriot act just isn’t applicable. No wide ranging powers are being given to the government to spy on citizens.

It’s just a lazy comparison.
 
Back
Top