Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

thethe said:
Did anyone drafting the consutituion or prior to 1950 ever think they'd have to address an issue where the president actively facilitated and encouraged 10-15M illegals to bypass our immigration system and remain in the country?
Click to expand...
This is the person who goes around calling people "uninformed clowns."

SMH.
 
The good news is thethe is implicitly endorsing universal health care being implemented by the next Democratic President. We can just declare a national emergency (people are dying after all) and create a 100% tax on all billionaires (but really it’s all about Elon Musk and removing his sinister influence from the world, citing his foreign birth, government work and concerning embrace of political causes abroad) to fund it. And if the courts say it’s illegal, that’s nonsense. The American people voted for this.
 
mqt said:
The good news is thethe is implicitly endorsing universal health care being implemented by the next Democratic President. We can just declare a national emergency (people are dying after all) and create a 100% tax on all billionaires (but really it’s all about Elon Musk and removing his sinister influence from the world, citing his foreign birth, government work and concerning embrace of political causes abroad) to fund it. And if the courts say it’s illegal, that’s nonsense. The American people voted for this.
Click to expand...
Oh so you think these things are all the same? That's the take you're going forward with?
 
acesfull86 said:
Oh so you think these things are all the same? That's the take you're going forward with?
Click to expand...
Donald Trump should have thought about this when he let in all the cancer and broken bones. We had no choice but to stop the bleeding by any means possible.

Also, if I win an election I get to decide what things are now actually.
 
Just remember sturg. It’s not trumps fault if the illegals aren’t deported. Can’t say he hasn’t tried everything.
 
thethe said:
How many laws did the founders break?
Click to expand...
The Trump Administration is the boot, not the revolutionaries. So far basically the only thing SCOTUS has not let you do here is violate due process to one guy you wanted to disappear into a foreign prison.

I’m sorry that only one of the two branches is willing to cede all its authority to the Executive.
 
mqt said:
The Trump Administration is the boot, not the revolutionaries. So far basically the only thing SCOTUS has not let you do here is violate due process to one guy you wanted to disappear into a foreign prison.

I’m sorry that only one of the two branches is willing to cede all its authority to the Executive.
Click to expand...

Due process intended for slaves and never contemplated to mean millions of illegals flooding the border facilitated by a president.
 
thethe said:
Due process intended for slaves and never contemplated to mean millions of illegals flooding the border facilitated by a president.
Click to expand...
It would appear the Supreme Court is actively contemplating that question, and you just don’t like some of the conclusions they’ve reached thus far.

I suspect I won’t like some of the other conclusions they reach, but it won’t mean the Constitution should be reconsidered.
 
mqt said:
It would appear the Supreme Court is actively contemplating that question, and you just don’t like some of the conclusions they’ve reached thus far.

I suspect I won’t like some of the other conclusions they reach, but it won’t mean the Constitution should be reconsidered.
Click to expand...

Any system that allows the invasion of our country without the citizens say is a system that needs drastic overhaul.
 
nsacpi said:
How is the 14th amendment related to this case?
Click to expand...
One of the glaring holes in the “whatever Trump wants is per se legal” defense is that it can be hard to keep track of which parts of the constitution you’re attempting to re-write on the fly.
 
mqt said:
One of the glaring holes in the “whatever Trump wants is per se legal” defense is that it can be hard to keep track of which parts of the constitution you’re attempting to re-write on the fly.
Click to expand...

Please say the 14th amendment wasn’t written because of slaves.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top