Economics Thread

Real economic headwind

Goldman sees tariffs as a real economic headwind—not just a headline risk. Higher prices may drag on real incomes, stalling consumption and growth. Add slowing hiring and trade data, and the stage is set for policy shifts and weaker GDP. But there is always a silver lining...

Tariffs boost inflation

GS: "...we expect our baseline tariff forecast to result in a roughly 1.7pp cumulative boost to core PCE prices between 2025 and 2027."


Goldman argues that even a one-time price increase will eat into real income, at a time when consumer spending trends already look shaky.
GS: "...we estimate that real personal consumption has now stagnated on net for six months, which rarely happens outside of recession."
The weakness in consumption and housing has pushed down their tracking estimate for H1 real GDP growth to 1.1%, about a percentage point below potential.
GS continued: "We expect a similar pace in H2, as the growing real income drag from tariff-related price increases offsets the boost from easier financial conditions."

The pace of hiring is slowing

Private payrolls grew only 74k in June according to the Labor Department and contracted outright according to ADP. On a similar note, the payroll diffusion index has fallen to levels indicating that there are now just as many industries cutting as adding jobs.
GS: "... if GDP growth remains sluggish, the labor market might soon hit “stall speed”—a pace of job creation weak enough to trigger a self-reinforcing rise in unemployment. "
First there was new data showing the number of shipping containers carrying US imports fell for a second straight month, setting the stage for one of the sharpest year-on-year reversals on record thanks to President Donald Trump’s trade war.
Veteran industry analyst John McCown, writing in a monthly report based on the 10 largest US ports, said that inbound container volume fell 7.9% in June from a year before. Similar declines during the global financial crisis and the pandemic were short-term slumps. In this case, however, he estimated that a 25% reduction in US container volumes is “readily possible” and would translate “directly into a $510 billion reduction in annual commerce for the US.”
 
Do you even care about the workers of the poor *checks notes* US Circuit industry? Just ignore that the industry is probably dead from the massive increase in their raw material costs. Only Panicans talk about that.
I thought panicans got retired for ludites
 
Back
Top