It really does but man if it’s true. A lot of folks broke their back twisting themselves like a pretzel convincing themselves that this kid was a groyper (who are, to be clear, awful but still)
I thought it was obvious his post was about others around the world (that we also help at a higher rate than any other country) instead of his neighbors kids next door.
Mine as well.
What you’re describing here is a difference in political opinions on the role of the United States as it seeks to retain its place as the global superpower in a constantly evolving global environment. Forgive me for not thinking billionaires who land on a different conclusion on that point are guilty of some crime punishable by death.
In order to stay a world power that does not maintain that status through conflict, maybe! The worse the conditions in the rest of the world relative to America, the more incentive there is for global cooperation to address the elephant in the room of whether or not we’re a genuine ally to the world. America itself is only as moral and just as the way in which we wield our tremendous influence.
The perception of the United States from an entire continent filled with vital natural resources that they can choose to provide access to either China or the United States to extract isn’t important? When I discuss feeding kids in Africa in terms of global power, it’s actually cynical. I think we should feed kids in Africa so that kids in Africa don’t starve. But the US government and CCP feed kids in Africa in no small part because it is a relatively cheap and low risk way to maintain socioeconomic influence in the region.
The casing said "Hey Fascist Catch" with arrows going up right then 3 down.