Tapate50
Well-known member
It is crazy that we can’t agree whole heartedly that community safety is probably the most important feature for societies to flourishI honestly cant fathom that people genuinely think like you
It is crazy that we can’t agree whole heartedly that community safety is probably the most important feature for societies to flourishI honestly cant fathom that people genuinely think like you
Why do you think on DAY 1 that VA democrats pushed to end mandatory sentencing laws? Why was that something they aggressively persued?Thank you
PHDs scared to debate message board posters: nsacpiStates standing up for the constitution: Minnesota
States standing up for the constitution: Minnesota
i seem to have missed something(s) you would like to respond toPHDs scared to debate message board posters: nsacpi
Minneapolis is standing up against a form of policing that is unconstitutional. Immigration law can and has been enforced in ways that are consistent with the constitution. Si se puede.So... ignoring federal immigration law in regard to the Constitution is standing up for it?
Yes the constitution thst says as a fugitive your safe if you are in a house?Minneapolis is standing up against a form of policing that is unconstitutional. Immigration law can and has been enforced in ways that are consistent with the constitution. Si se puede.
Those of us who care about the constitution are grateful for the fortitude of the people of Minnesota.
Minneapolis is standing up against a form of policing that is unconstitutional. Immigration law can and has been enforced in ways that are consistent with the constitution. Si se puede.
Those of us who care about the constitution are grateful for the fortitude of the people of Minnesota.
SenileYou're out of your mind.
Because everything is a seesaw now. They use mandatory sentencing laws for things that I agree are unjust as well. I wish there’d be better restraint on these things.Why do you think on DAY 1 that VA democrats pushed to end mandatory sentencing laws? Why was that something they aggressively persued?
They just want respect for everyone! And don’t call them “rapists,” they’re “people with aggressive penises.”Can a leftist explain why this specifically was such a priority?
This is a fair response. So let me ask why you think someone else would want to release this person? What do you think the motivation would be in this specific case?I think there’s certain cases where it is reasonable: say an undiagnosed and isolated schizophrenic person goes crazy and kills someone because the voices told them to. I don’t think that person deserves to simply rot in prison forever. I wouldn’t let them right back out on the street, but I wouldn’t think life in prison is the right answer either.
I don’t think it should be applied in the manner in which it was here.
Easily the most dysfunctional state I've ever seen. Imagine voting for their governor to be VP
I think there are plausible motivations that run from overzealously applying statutes designed to protect those that commit crimes while not perfectly sane to judicial activism designed to reduce incarceration all the way to corruption/kickbacks from mental health facilities. I don’t think there are many, if any judges that want to put murderers back on the street, but we have processes in place if the DA is unsatisfied with the ruling of a judge.This is a fair response. So let me ask why you think someone else would want to release this person? What do you think the motivation would be in this specific case?
It’s the single worst ticket ever put forthEasily the most dysfunctional state I've ever seen. Imagine voting for their governor to be VP