Some Red State/Blue State Indicia

Except those data are wrong. Germany's per capita GDP (and this includes backwards formerly communist areas in East Germany) is comfortably above Mississippi's. About $10,000 per year using PPP (Purchasing Power Parity). For the Netherlands (which doesn't have a backwards formerly communist area to weigh down the national average), the difference in per capita GDP versus Mississippi is about $15,000.

From where I sit the European Socialists are easily outscoring Mississippi. And Oklahoma. And West Virginia. And Arkansas. And Alabama. And Kentucky. And Louisiana. And Tennessee.

And so are all those socialist blue states.

Scoreboard don't lie!!
 
Last edited:
Yes I would expect those major countries to be outperforming small states.

And per capital GDP is going to be heavily influenced by government spending. I'll bet you'll never guess which states and countries spend more!
 
zitothebrave said:
Leave it to th econservative snowflakes to complain about a state trying to improve public transportation and land access.

Read the summary of the bill

This bill, based on laws and regulations in Colorado and Minnesota,, would align the Commonwealth’s transportation plans with its climate mandates. It would require MassDOT’s transportation plans to provide a reasonable pathway to compliance with our emissions limits for the transportation sector. If a statewide transportation plan were not going to deliver adequate emissions reductions, then it would have to be amended to include greater investment in public transit, bike and pedestrian infrastructure, or other clean transportation options. The bill would also require MassDOT to set goals for reducing the number of statewide driving miles, which would be considered when EEA sets greenhouse gas emissions limits and sublimits. Finally, the bill would establish an interagency coordinating council—similar to the existing coordinating council for EV charging infrastructure—to come up with a whole-of-government plan to reduce vehicle miles traveled and increase access to transportation options other than personal vehicles. The legislation would ensure that Massachusetts stays on track to reduce emissions from transportation—the sector that accounts for the greatest share of emissions in the Commonwealth.
Click to expand...
stopped reading after "aligns their transportation plans with its climate mandate"

enjoy your monitored driving habits due to your lunatic party
 
who cares - think about the amazing GDP per capital this created


HFvPmI5bQAA_qU9
 
I have a question for the phd ( yes i know he won't answer)

Why is homelessness so high in California? Its doubled under Newsom.

Theyve thrown money at it. Oh have they. 4x increase

Why is it worse?

Does it matter?

The public said "ok tax me even more to solve this problem"... but the problem got much worse.

Why?
 
sturg33 said:
I have a question for the phd ( yes i know he won't answer)

Why is homelessness so high in California? Its doubled under Newsom.

Theyve thrown money at it. Oh have they. 4x increase

Why is it worse?

Does it matter?

The public said "ok tax me even more to solve this problem"... but the problem got much worse.

Why?
Click to expand...
This a question only a phd can understand
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top