Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

mqt said:
My point isn’t that the left is doing nothing wrong. My point is that Supercuts of Dems saying incendiary things so that you can make this out to be a distinct feature of the left is a farce when the target of said violence is Donald fucking Trump, who demonizes or calls for violence against his political enemies every 15 seconds.
Click to expand...
Can you post all the times trump calls for political violence?
 
cajunrevenge said:
How many war crimes has Trump comitted or threatened to commit. What's the penalty for war crimes?
Click to expand...
I’m big on the reformation of systems, not vigilantes reckoning they can play judge, jury and executioner.

I also think Trump is less culpable for this than the Congress that is allowing him unchecked power.
 
mqt said:
My point isn’t that the left is doing nothing wrong. My point is that Supercuts of Dems saying incendiary things so that you can make this out to be a distinct feature of the left is a farce when the target of said violence is Donald fucking Trump, who demonizes or calls for violence against his political enemies every 15 seconds.
Click to expand...
You’re pretending like these comments are being taken out of context. Political violence is a feature of Marxist ideology which your party is moving towards.

the fact that Trump is the target of violence is not relevant nor is his own moral shortcomings and hypocrisy.
 
People more upset about one nut job trying to kill a couple people than a man threatening to wipe an entire civilization out. And they think they said on the moral highground.
 
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F755fc592-46bb-4135-833b-43cb7f7ac383_1536x2048.jpeg
 
still ever the protector ( passive aggressive keyboard warrior you are) of the Trumps.
Walk down the street and ask anypasserby, " did Trump threaten Pence" and you will get the same response.

Or so to be sure you dont have to risk being out side, google is you friend.

I think it is what Nixon, Roy Cohen , Roger Stone labeled

What is a plausible deniability example?


AI Overview


Plausible deniability is the ability for a leader or official to deny knowledge of wrongdoing by subordinates because no direct evidence links them to the act. It is achieved by creating a gap between commanding an outcome and knowing the methods used. Examples include vague orders, shielded communication, or intentional ignorance.
www.changefactory.com.auwww.changefactory.com.au +1
Common Examples of Plausible Deniability:
  • Political/Executive Action: A CEO tells a manager, "I want sales up 50% by any means necessary," but ignores the specific methods, allowing them to deny knowledge if the manager engages in illegal activity to meet the goal.
  • Historical/Espionage:A government official orders an intelligence agency to "deal with" a foreign threat, avoiding specific, written instructions about assassination or covert actions, thus enabling a denial of direct involvement
    .
    • Administrative/Legal: A leader sets up a committee to handle a scandal, ensuring they do not receive direct reports on the findings, allowing them to claim they were not informed of the results.
    • Vague Instructions: A leader stating, "It would be nice if that person wasn't here," rather than giving a direct order to remove someone, allowing them to claim their words were misinterpreted.
    • Digital/Corporate: A company using encrypted, self-destructing, or no records for sensitive conversations, leaving no paper trail to connect leaders to illegal instructions.
Essentially, it is creating a scenario where a denial of involvement is plausible because there is a lack of hard proof, even if, in reality, the person was aware.
US Legal Forms
US Legal Forms
//////////////////////

Grow up little boy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top