Recency bias? I never thought the Phillies were that good and felt they heavily overperfomed last year. Coupled with the Braves having a weird year, they won a lot of games. But I never thought they were that level of talent.I think you just hate him because he‘s a Phillies fan (and rightfully so…f them).
Still, a lot of what you say reeks of recency bias. If I could time-travel back to late March, and show you last night’s lineup, and also told you that Ronald was injured and sitting on 2 HR in mid May, and also told you that Rey Lopez is now in the pen and we are giving regular starts to Elder, Holmes and JR Ritchie, would you have said „Sounds like a .700 team to me!“? Even if I also told you that Olson and Baldwin are having all-star seasons,Ozzie is closer to his old self, Sale is Sale, and we have one of the best reliever trios in the game, you‘d probably still think „Hopefully we‘re above .500“.
Point being: Based on the true abilities of these players, I think we are playing over our heads. I wouldn’t bet on the Braves even playing .600 ball the rest of the way, let alone .700. I still think they’re going to cruise to the division title. But I don’t think they will look like the best team in MLB by the end of the season.
They’re not a terrible team. I just don’t think they’re terribly impressive either, and definitely not a 96 win team like last year. They are old and getting older, and we’ve been saying that for years. They have a bloated payroll because they can’t develop players at all. Their chickens were going to come home to roost at some point. They do legitimately have one reliable BP piece. The Braves have three. The Phillies depth is awful. The Braves depth is good. Awful depth with an old, expensive team is a recipe for a poor season.
I don’t think anyone is arguing that the Braves will play at a 70% clip the rest of the season. They’re not going to win 113 games. But it’s clearly the most talented team in the division and frankly has been for years.