Fútbol Discusión

gilesfan said:
That is Chelsea bound Cesc.

LOL Keith Lockhart. Thought he would never play for anyone other than Arsenal in the PL?

Messi is going to dominate this tourney
Click to expand...

I don't get Chelsea sometimes. It's like they have to spend more money than anyone in the world. He also confirmed that Arsenal had the chance to resign him and didn't. That really doesn't make too much sense for the Gunners.

I'm guessing this means Kroos to Chelsea is less likely so it's the Gunners and Man U as his most likely suitors?

Also Messi needs a big tourney. He and Ronaldo were pretty flat last world cup.
 
zitothebrave said:
I don't get Chelsea sometimes. It's like they have to spend more money than anyone in the world. He also confirmed that Arsenal had the chance to resign him and didn't. That really doesn't make too much sense for the Gunners.

I'm guessing this means Kroos to Chelsea is less likely so it's the Gunners and Man U as his most likely suitors?

Also Messi needs a big tourney. He and Ronaldo were pretty flat last world cup.
Click to expand...

He's just asking for too much money.

Mourinho will destroy his career.
 
He did because he wasn't gonna win **** with Arsenal cause Arsenal is pathetic. Couldn't keep RvP either. They're terrible.
 
gilesfan said:
How long are Arsenal fans going to complain about stadium debt? Until 2075?
Click to expand...

Isn't Arsenal at like6th or 7th in the BPL in commercial debt? And they're one of a few teams who netted an obvious profit in the BPL. The only other european contention team to turn a profit last year was Everton and Tottenham. Man U, Loss, Chelsea and Man City big losses. Of course they make the money up in non-BPL matches, but Arsenal's ownership is the problem, not "stadium debt"
 
zitothebrave said:
Isn't Arsenal at like6th or 7th in the BPL in commercial debt? And they're one of a few teams who netted an obvious profit in the BPL. The only other european contention team to turn a profit last year was Everton and Tottenham. Man U, Loss, Chelsea and Man City big losses. Of course they make the money up in non-BPL matches, but Arsenal's ownership is the problem, not "stadium debt"
Click to expand...

Arsenal have been one of the few fiscally conservative clubs in the BPL in the last decade. Wenger has done a phenomenal job considering the circumstances. We are one of the few teams not operating under debt year to year. Kroenke is using our profits to pay off stadium. This wasn't like an American tax payer initiative m
 
KeithLockhart said:
Arsenal have been one of the few fiscally conservative clubs in the BPL in the last decade. Wenger has done a phenomenal job considering the circumstances. We are one of the few teams not operating under debt year to year. Kroenke is using our profits to pay off stadium. This wasn't like an American tax payer initiative m
Click to expand...

And then he'll continue to use the profits to pad his bank account. Arsenal under WEnger won't spend money. Enjoy toiling at the bottom of the UEFA
 
KeithLockhart said:
We just spent a ton on Ozil and threw it at Liverpool for Suarez but they didn't bite.
Click to expand...

But they couldn't bring back Fabregas.

If Arsenal actaully invested in their team a little and didn't Liberty Media the roster.

Arsenal again strictyl on BPL pulled the biggest profits. I think they sat it out assuming that Chelsea would have paid a bit more money and Arsenal would have profited off the sale. It was a calculated gamble. They should have offered Barca just under the minimum of what it would have taken to get Cesc back. Basically Arsenal totally got ****ed by their sale of Fbregas as they lost out on potentially nearly 20M euros between Barca not maximizing trophies and them getting nothing back on his sale to Rival Chelsea.
 
That Van Persie goal was brilliance. Can't believe Spain got stomped 5-1. Wonder if Casillas will get blamed and de Gea brought in for next match.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top