ramadon101
Danville Rookie
Eh. Markakis is a solid player and is still young enough to be considered for a 3 year deal (may even get 4 from a team at a lower AAV) but consider the following for a moment:
Player 1 -- 8.0 fWAR, 2013-2014. 600 PA @ 114 wRC+ followed by 531 PA @ 103 wRC+. +9.2 and +21.6 DEF ratings. Will turn 31 in May of 2015.
Player 2 -- 2.5 fWAR, 2013-2014. 700 PA @ 88 wRC+ followed by 710 PA @ 106 wRC+. -14.1 and -2.5 DEF ratings. Will turn 31 in November of 2014.
Both are projected to earn roughly the same (say around $12-14m per for 3-4 years).
Player 1 is Chase Headley. Player 2 is Nick Markakis (who, mind you, had a 0 WAR just a year before-- albeit due to injury issues).
I'd advocate us going after Headley, dumping CJ (either independently or as part of a package deal), signing someone like Aoki, Hunter, etc. who projects to have similar (or slightly less) production than Markakis for a OF spot and go to war on the offense.
Player 1 -- 8.0 fWAR, 2013-2014. 600 PA @ 114 wRC+ followed by 531 PA @ 103 wRC+. +9.2 and +21.6 DEF ratings. Will turn 31 in May of 2015.
Player 2 -- 2.5 fWAR, 2013-2014. 700 PA @ 88 wRC+ followed by 710 PA @ 106 wRC+. -14.1 and -2.5 DEF ratings. Will turn 31 in November of 2014.
Both are projected to earn roughly the same (say around $12-14m per for 3-4 years).
Player 1 is Chase Headley. Player 2 is Nick Markakis (who, mind you, had a 0 WAR just a year before-- albeit due to injury issues).
I'd advocate us going after Headley, dumping CJ (either independently or as part of a package deal), signing someone like Aoki, Hunter, etc. who projects to have similar (or slightly less) production than Markakis for a OF spot and go to war on the offense.