NBA Thread

Do you think there is a lot of internal drama that is ready to explode at any time. Something seems off about the team. So much talent and yet they don't really feel dominant when you watch.

I think that's very overblown; there's some frustration for certain longer-tenured players (primarily Noah), because the group defensive-effort hasn't been present every game as it has in years past, but I honestly do perceive a lot of internal team discord. What's off for them has really been health: they haven't had many long stretches where they've had their nine guys (ten if you're forced to count Hinrich) healthy, which is tough since almost half of those guys are new to the team, and Thibodeau's defensive system takes time to pick up.

But they've looked plenty dominant at times—that December through early January stretch featured some of the best regular-season basketball I've seen them play in the Thibodeau era, because they were killing it offensively and seemed able to ratchet up the defensive pressure in the second-half—and I think they can improve even more over their final twenty-five games. Big, encouraging keys for them have emerged over the past two weeks:

  • Dunleavy's healthy return, which is huge, as he's vastly underrated, glue to the starting-unit, and a heady player that just doesn't make mistakes;
  • the game clicking for Snell, who looks like a legitimate rotation player finally, and who has been playing great defensive on the wing, provides another three-point-shooting threat that they can really use, and finally gives them someone who can spell Butler, mitigating the miles he logs before the playoffs;
  • Mirotić seeming to gather a second-wind, after hitting a bit of a Euro-rookie wall, having never played this many games in a professional season.

If everyone can stay healthy—except for Hinrich, who's really pretty useless at this point—I think the Bulls can stay on the up-swing.
 
Westbrook is averaging a career-high 26.1 points, 8.0 assists and 6.4 rebounds (also a career high) per game this season. Three players in NBA history have averaged 26-8-6 in a season: Oscar Robertson (eight times), LeBron James (2009-10) and Michael Jordan (1988-89).

No one has been responsible for more of his team’s points than Westbrook this season. He has been responsible for a career-high 44.1 points per game.
 
Im asking because I'm wondering if they are confusing it with "points produced?"

Harden has scored 1,528 and assisted on another 947 points, which equals 2,475 points. At 56 games, that's 44.2 per game, which is 43% of Houston points on the year.

I also found it odd that the best comp for Harden is Westbrook (Arenas and Curry next)

Harden Win shares 12.8 12.8 9.3 7.1 4.5
BestBrook 11.6 9.4 7.9 6.1 5.2
Curry 13.6 11.2 10.8 6.5 2.2
 
http://deadspin.com/uh-guys-i-think-the-wizards-forgot-to-fire-randy-witt-1687621585

Im really not someone that calls for coaches head unless they are Fredi level dumb, but Wittman is pretty much Fredi level dumb. The only reason the team is as good as it is is that Wall is such a good player.

The comments section brings up Otto. Otto has a very deadly mid range game and length to disturb guys on defense. yet, he doesn't even get used and they don't design any plays that cater to his strengths in the mid range game.
 
And someone puts it better than me>

http://www.bulletsforever.com/2015/...jackson-can-the-wizards-find-their-steve-kerr

Wittman's shortcomings are well chronicled. Very, very well chronicled. Offensively, the Wizards run a ton of complicated action that culminates in shots that defenses basically want them to take. While they shoot it well at the rim and from beyond the arc, they lead the league in long two's -- the game's worst shot. The result is a below-average offense. Wittman's failure to address this is, quite honestly, inexcusable.

It is insane to watch a team run some creative sets....to result in a long 2 point jumper
 
I didn't realize that it got so bad over there. Is there an outcry to change coaches?

Its tough because the team is so good and going to be the best team in the last 30 years, but yes; people recognize that it could be better without Wittman.
 
Its tough because the team is so good and going to be the best team in the last 30 years, but yes; people recognize that it could be better without Wittman.

I feel like you guys are in that danger zone that Atlanta was in many years ago. If a big FA (Durant) decides to go there then you'll take off but you will more than likely never get a solid draft pick.
 
I feel like you guys are in that danger zone that Atlanta was in many years ago. If a big FA (Durant) decides to go there then you'll take off but you will more than likely never get a solid draft pick.

All they need a 1 max player to join Wall.
 
Harden is actually a great defender when he tries.

Yep but he still guards the opposing teams worse perimeter threat.

But that is how Houston schemes and it gives him more energy to dominate on the other end.
 
And someone puts it better than me>

http://www.bulletsforever.com/2015/...jackson-can-the-wizards-find-their-steve-kerr

Wittman's shortcomings are well chronicled. Very, very well chronicled. Offensively, the Wizards run a ton of complicated action that culminates in shots that defenses basically want them to take. While they shoot it well at the rim and from beyond the arc, they lead the league in long two's -- the game's worst shot. The result is a below-average offense. Wittman's failure to address this is, quite honestly, inexcusable.

It is insane to watch a team run some creative sets....to result in a long 2 point jumper
I didn't realize that it got so bad over there. Is there an outcry to change coaches?

Same; good to know.
 
Harden is actually a great defender when he tries.

Thats quite the over exaggeration. He has long arms which are always a prerequisite to a great defender but he doesn't have the agility to keep guys in front of him.
 
Back
Top