First of all, before trumpeting that statistic as some invaluable, stop-in-your-tracks piece of news: how about a classification break down?
- How many were armed?
- How many put others at risk?
- How many were on the run?
How would you have stopped this guy?
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/11/26/...-chase/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Or this guy?
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2015/03/27/webster-police-shoot-kill-man-during-chase/
Better yet, what's your solution? Are you going to try and strip all of the guns out of circulation so we can be like the United Kingdom (less than 1K on the streets, supposedly)? Are you going to give LEOs less authority?
Or are you just going to continue to be one of the people that bitches and moans about the 'militarization' of law enforcement while meanwhile benefiting in every possible way from the protections it provides?
It's like there's this refusal on your part to actually to see the other end of the spectrum you tacitly advocate.
Willing suspension of disbelief.
Believe me, I get your idealism and I love it, but it's just not applicable here and it never will be.