He's retiring.
Does this save us money?
No. It'll cost us whatever small portion the M's would have picked up if he made the bigs.
Quentin, I'm betting, will get at least 200 ABs for them, and will show he does have value.
We're not paying him anything?
If he retires his money isn't guaranteed anymore.
I'm assuming that we're on the hook for it because we DFA'd him.
Jon Heyman
@JonHeymanCBS
Technically, mariners are granting his release. But that's really semantics. Quentin's injuries won't allow him to play.
---
Do the Braves actually employ MDs?
If he's unable to play because of injury, could we have gotten some kind of salary relief from insurance? I suppose not. Surely we'd have done that if possible.
Why not just hang on to him and wait until injury (insurance is pretty standard on long-term MLB contracts these days, and Quentin's knee problems were pretty evident this spring) or retirement comes? Maybe that was a condition of him waiving his no-trade clause.
I still don't understand why the Braves felt such an immediate need to DFA him, though.
Clearly he is worthless. No team traded for him and the one who signed him will get nothing out of him.
Jon Heyman
@JonHeymanCBS
Technically, mariners are granting his release. But that's really semantics. Quentin's injuries won't allow him to play.
---
Do the Braves actually employ MDs?
Clearly he is worthless. No team traded for him and the one who signed him will get nothing out of him.
At least we won't be on the hook for the $3M buyout for next year
What makes you think we're not? It was reported that we were back before we released him.