5/12/15 Braves @ Reds

This will serve as a valueable learning experience for Folty. I don't care that he let up the tying run. This start was a HUGE positive.
 
That was a really dumb decision to bunt there by the Reds, but they got away with it because of the bad throw. I mean you bunt a slow player over to second with a guy who hasn't hit much coming up next.
 
OK dumb question concerning scoring. Looking at the boxscore on ESPN, it shows Folty with three earned runs. Why isn't the last one unearned as it was set up by an error and (without it) the inning would be over with no runs scored? I didn't think it mattered if the error was on the pitcher.
 
Not that I know ****, but I'm fine with leaving Folty out there to start the 7th. Shame about the error.
 
OK dumb question concerning scoring. Looking at the boxscore on ESPN, it shows Folty with three earned runs. Why isn't the last one unearned as it was set up by an error and (without it) the inning would be over with no runs scored? I didn't think it mattered if the error was on the pitcher.

I think it does matter. It certainly should.
 
OK dumb question concerning scoring. Looking at the boxscore on ESPN, it shows Folty with three earned runs. Why isn't the last one unearned as it was set up by an error and (without it) the inning would be over with no runs scored? I didn't think it mattered if the error was on the pitcher.

Never mind, they just changed it back to two earned runs.
 
OK dumb question concerning scoring. Looking at the boxscore on ESPN, it shows Folty with three earned runs. Why isn't the last one unearned as it was set up by an error and (without it) the inning would be over with no runs scored? I didn't think it mattered if the error was on the pitcher.

Once Avilan got Votto out that run should've been unearned, a hit by Votto would've made it earned though (correction, a hit would've made three earned and four runs). So end result is an unearned run.
 
Back
Top