Do you think going deep into games/throwing a lot of innings isn't important when designating someone as an ace? Rate stats are all that matter?
He isn't one of GFs favorites. He doesn't even like the BraVes anymore. He is just trolling. I decided to troll back.
Haters gonna hate.
![]()
Heyward isn't one of my favorites. He's just another ex player to me.
I guess I don't like the Braves!
To be fair, this is still very much under review.
He threw 215 innings last year (14th in baseball) in the first year they stopped babying him because of the arm injury.
And that was good, sure. Still not really ace-like IMO. I don't think he's on a guy like Felix's level (yet), and he's an ace. If he can stay healthy, he will get there. He's really good. Pitching deep into games is extremely important to me when calling someone an ace. It's not all that matters, but IMO you need the right combo. Only a few guys fit that title. Rate stats don't make someone an ace.
Btw...Harper is still doing the best hitter in baseball thing
He's toying with teams and taking the ball out to left field lately...
But, he said Trout is the best hitter in baseball. Came from the horses mouth.
Well, if your judgment of an ace is they have to be on the level of King Felix, there aren't many aces in baseball. I can probably count them on one hand.
by the board of directors?
What's the quantifiable number that makes someone an "ace"
He's toying with teams and taking the ball out to left field lately...
But, he said Trout is the best hitter in baseball. Came from the horses mouth.
What's the quantifiable number that makes someone an "ace"
Did I say there was one? Does there have to be one?
Shouldn't there be? Rather than subjectively deciding if someone is an "ace" when you rarely see that pitcher pitch
OPS up to a whopping .676.