I doubt that any big league GM with aspirations to contend would take 5 years of a adequate-to-slightly-above-average 2B over one year of a top-echelon power-hitting LF. There's a reasonable chance that the AAV of Upton's next contract is more than JP earns in his big-league career.
You like him. I like him. But it's way easier to replace Jace Peterson in the lineup than to find a beast righty slugger. Hence the valuation.
And, Weso, I think there's a better chance that Justin Upton is a stud in 2017 than that Jace becomes anything more than he is right now—a nice complementary piece.
But, you have to consider the consequences of your bet. If you are wrong about Upton then you have to trade a guy like Kimbrel to get him off the books. If you are wrong about Peterson then you have to trade my butt hair. Point being... well, you get it.
So then you always want the inferior/cheaper player?
Well, it depends on the players and the money. I could potentially get more for my money with Jace and 18 mil to spend at multiple positions. I wouldn't mind have Jace Peterson, Dexter Fowler and Lucroy on the team for example.
I would trade Jace for a 1st rounder just for the chance that player becomes a stud. I can find another Jace easily.
You aren't getting Lucroy and Fowler for 17.5 million past 2015 or maybe 2016.
I would take Upton, Peraza, Cervelli over Peterson, Fowler, Lucroy.
And you're looking for a catcher in 2017 while the three Johns and I are drinking champagne whilest winning multiple world series. And you had to trade Peraza to get Cervelli so he can't be on your roster. You have Upton and that's it in 2017. And Upton has turned into Dan Uggla.
oh ok. How did the Pirates get him for Justin Wilson?
And how did you get Lucroy?
BTW, at this point in time Jace Peterson has .4 WAR less than Upton. So at this time its projecting that Upton is 1-1.5 WAR greater than Jace and we have Jace for 5 more years.
Cervelli's value has gone up now that he's actually starting.
I traded Peraza to get Lucroy.
And what else?
Well said. I think it's fair to assume that Jace can sustain a 90 wRC+. I don't think it's fair to assume his defense is this good until the metrics have time to stabilize. I have noticed in the past few games him missing a few balls that the second best defender at his position should be able to get. While it is forgivable, in order to be a great player he has to be Andrelton lite or his bat won't carry him.IMO Jace can be a complimentary piece. Not someone you build around but what contending teams need to contend. I wouldn't say everyone team has them and they are easy to find becuase if the Braves had a Jace Peterson at 2nd and center the last couple of years we are one of the best teams in baseball.
That being said I don't think anyone knows what we have in him yet. He's had a high BABIP the last few weeks or whatever. Is that sustaintable? He is fast so it could be but we will have to wait and see. He's still at a 90 WRC+ though which isn't good by and stretch and right around average for his position. He is getting a real boost from his defense. And again is that sustainable? Is he really that good of a defender or is it just him benefiting from a small sample size?
Time will tell with him which is fine because the Braves have a couple of years before we are contenders IMO and that will give the Braves plenty of time to see what we really have in him.
What 2B is playing better defense ?
It is kind of a hard position to metric. How do you measure cut off dependability? Or how they respond to back up situations. When do they hold the ball or make a useless throw on an attempted DP ???
So many more things middle infielders do than range for ground balls.
LaStella sucked at all those things I just mentioned. And Uggla was so-so.
Prado was better than both
Jace is a definite upgrade over them all
I agree wholeheartedly. On a related not, it's one of the reasons why I feel Andrelton is somewhat underrated by defensive metrics. All of his little moves that he's mastered, such as the second base pick off play, his relay throws, etc. aren't properly encapsulated by defensive metrics (I don't think, I could be wrong).
It's likely why a combination of the eye test coupled with DRS is probably the best way to evaluate those guys.
BTW, at this point in time Jace Peterson has .4 WAR less than Upton. So at this time its projecting that Upton is 1-1.5 WAR greater than Jace and we have Jace for 5 more years.