Never understood why people were so quick to jump off the Sims bandwagon.
Never understood why people were so quick to jump off the Sims bandwagon.
Because he was performing horribly?
He's improved his K-rate somewhat. And k-rate is what I care about the most in the minors. But he's not mowing people down either
Pitchers progress at different rates. We all scout sat lines way too much. Reports from guys like deester are more valueable. He wasn't a fan of Sims so I heavily weighted his input as hr has seen him pitch. We never know what the coaches are asking the pitchers to work on.
You have to put some credibility in actual performance. So far, Simms hasn't been good.
I frankly don't know how everything works with the slot system... but I would have rather taken higher upside picks and forgone some signings... In other words, sign 8/10 higher upside players rather than the 10/10 we did.
I wanted Cameron or Hayes
I frankly don't know how everything works with the slot system... but I would have rather taken higher upside picks and forgone some signings... In other words, sign 8/10 higher upside players rather than the 10/10 we did.
I wanted Cameron or Hayes
He has always maintained a good age to level ratio. Yes, at some point they need to perform. Sims has already and it's still too early to hold him to thatbstandard.
Thanks thethe, I have seen him quite a bit. I've always said the tools are there. I would post videos but the external HD doesn't jibe with my Mac. So I've resorted to Braxton videos and Albies. Anywho, I'm no scout but I've played and coached up to HS so you could say I'm inexact but a fan. I use the eyeball and a few stats so it's a mix for me. ERA, WINS,LOSSES don't really concern me. But here are my thoughts on Sims:Pitchers progress at different rates. We all scout sat lines way too much. Reports from guys like deester are more valueable. He wasn't a fan of Sims so I heavily weighted his input as hr has seen him pitch. We never know what the coaches are asking the pitchers to work on.
The thing I like about Sims is his K rate. It dropped last year at A+, which was a concern, but it is back up now and even higher at AA than it's ever been. That is a good sign and gives me hope.
The hit rate has also dropped at AA. The obvious problem is that a BB rate that wasn't good but wasn't a huge concern in 2013-2014 has now ballooned to 5.2% at A+ this year and 7.8% so far at AA. That's less of a concern for me than a low BB rate combined with a low K rate, but at 21, it's time to start getting that down while keeping the K's high.
Next year will be a big year for him. If he can come back to AA and keep his K rate high while dropping his BB rate to something like 4% or lower, then I think he will jump back into his old status as a really good prospect. The jury is still out, and he has work to do, but I'm actually higher on him now than I was after last year and the early part of this year.
A valid factor might be that he missed a month after the bus crash?
This point is always overlooked and dismissed no matter how many times it's brought up 50. Braves were very deliberate with their draft.
It's not overlooked or dismissed at all, it's just not as big a deal as you guys are trying to make out. K'Bryan Hayes signed for less money than Soroka, so we could have easily swapped those two. Chris Betts signed for slightly less than what the slot value for the 41st pick was, so that would have been 100 grand less than what RIley signed for. Riley signed for 1.6 mil, which would have been 475,000 more than the value of the 54th pick. So we would have had to save 375K during the rest of the draft.
So basically we'd have to just go cheap on 2 picks in the 5th-8th rounds to have made it work. Players in the first 3 rounds have a much higher success rate than guys in rounds 5 and up, so I'd much rather go big on high upside players in the early rounds. And several teams did just that in the past draft, signing players to 50,000 contracts with their picks in the 4th, 5th, and 6th rounds. It's a pretty common thing to do to save money to spend on higher upside prospects in the earlier rounds.
Either way, I'd rather have Hayes than Soroka just because we need high impact bats, and Hayes has been fantastic in the rookie leagues as well. But hopefully Soroka winds up being a high #2 starter or better and proves me wrong.
Not sure what isn't to love so far about who the Braves picked. Its crazy early to make any determination but I wouldn't have changed one pick thus far.
K'Bryan Hayes is hitting .367/.462/.422/.884 in rookie ball with more walks than Ks and Chris Betts was the second best catcher prospect in the draft. Considering we have a gigantic need for impact bats not sure why it's hard to see people preferring us going a different route. Particularly when you factor in that our results when picking pitchers in the early rounds have been less than stellar under Clark's watch.
K'Bryan Hayes is hitting .367/.462/.422/.884 in rookie ball with more walks than Ks and Chris Betts was the second best catcher prospect in the draft. Considering we have a gigantic need for impact bats not sure why it's hard to see people preferring us going a different route. Particularly when you factor in that our results when picking pitchers in the early rounds have been less than stellar under Clark's watch.
You are still assuming that we could have taken Riley at pick 54 and there is absolutely no guarantee that happens and then we don't have Soroka who has been awesome so far.
The chances Riley wouldn't be there 13 picks later would be very slim. But either way I'd still rather have the potential high impact at 28 rather than Soroka, we have a bunch of guys that profile to be similar to Soroka already. And we've seen this past offseason and at the break this year how hard it is to trade for bats.