AerchAngel
<B>Secretary of Statistics</B>
What state and the Federal government have to avoid people in being happy?
She should have said it is a government contract for TWO people I would do it but you will not be recognize in any church. But the bimbo did not think it.
My gay cousins considers marriage as a government contract knowing no black church will recognize them and in most cases not allowing them in their church. But they won't say anything to disrupt the bigger picture that Jackson and Sharpton want.
But if the government is going to put her in jail for her beliefs, why would they agree with her not giving license to polygamous couples. Hypocrisy much?
I have come to this point, marriage is nothing, so polygamy is okay. Most liberals are not church goers so they should have no problem with polygamy.....the license is based on happiness, correct? If you have a problem with polygamy, then you are a hypocrite.
Don't give me the abuse angle, marriage with same or opposite sex, transgender all have their abuses, it just that same sex will not have it public for a reason.
The only thing I agree with is if two males married, they adopt a female child and then do the opposite for the opposite sex. I think the adopting agencies have this philosophy. The two churches we go to, both Catholic, many gay couples, all the children are the opposite sex of the parents. The congregation and priest have no problem with it. They don't recognize the marriage (No communion and other things...I don't receive it either and don't give a rats ass about it as well) but they recognize them as loving parents, butch and all. Great couples and outstanding kids and well behaved kids. We even invite them over to play but they decline as they don't want to create a scene. I told them I really don't care, kids need people they can play with and my son doesn't care as long as you are not from another planet and eat kids.
She should have said it is a government contract for TWO people I would do it but you will not be recognize in any church. But the bimbo did not think it.
My gay cousins considers marriage as a government contract knowing no black church will recognize them and in most cases not allowing them in their church. But they won't say anything to disrupt the bigger picture that Jackson and Sharpton want.
But if the government is going to put her in jail for her beliefs, why would they agree with her not giving license to polygamous couples. Hypocrisy much?
I have come to this point, marriage is nothing, so polygamy is okay. Most liberals are not church goers so they should have no problem with polygamy.....the license is based on happiness, correct? If you have a problem with polygamy, then you are a hypocrite.
Don't give me the abuse angle, marriage with same or opposite sex, transgender all have their abuses, it just that same sex will not have it public for a reason.
The only thing I agree with is if two males married, they adopt a female child and then do the opposite for the opposite sex. I think the adopting agencies have this philosophy. The two churches we go to, both Catholic, many gay couples, all the children are the opposite sex of the parents. The congregation and priest have no problem with it. They don't recognize the marriage (No communion and other things...I don't receive it either and don't give a rats ass about it as well) but they recognize them as loving parents, butch and all. Great couples and outstanding kids and well behaved kids. We even invite them over to play but they decline as they don't want to create a scene. I told them I really don't care, kids need people they can play with and my son doesn't care as long as you are not from another planet and eat kids.