2015 Really !!

57Brave said:
12208333_720516904746559_7745856920106076163_n.jpg
Click to expand...

So, some anonymous source lists things on twitter and you jump on board? You don't realize the difference between this and what Hillary did? I can understand blindly supporting parties, but I can't understand stupid.
 
How is this different from the run up to the "Benghazi Scandal" ?

Let's consider the 5-8 years of non stop bogus charges and character assassination that polluted the public conscience, "well she's a liar anyway"

When all they had was years and years of Whitewater - Rose Law Firm speculation .

Thee was no Twitter then.

So yeah, I would like to see these 4 stand up and explain -- the same way HRC was expected to -

How come Reagan's Sec of State (George Schultz ? ) or Sec of Defense were not grilled for 11 hours over the Beirut Marine Barracks.

200+.

Bush 43 over the many many Embassy Bombings and deaths ?

Shoot, Bush 43 and Cheney grilled for Iraq and Afghanistan

Why not have these 4 Senators explain why they are not members of the KKK
 
Depends.

Hey giles, your thoughts on Dusty Baker.
I think Harper will flourish under him
you ?
 
Well how is it different?
I'm talking the 20 year run up to Benghazi.

I know you weren't following current events 1993-2000.

but your distrust of HRC was born the same way we will all distrust Cornyn Coates, Tillis and Isakson now.
 
Here we are in 2015 with Twitter - Google and still this.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/...ut-he-can-t-hide-his-credit-card-mess-forever

Would this constitute a scandal ? A Senate Select Committee or a Grand Jury ?
This is not an old story. Just no one in Florida thought he'd ever get this far.
Poor Marco

And so on. Basically, Rubio's defense boils down to "I'm not corrupt, just sloppy." Sloppy like he couldn't keep track of which credit card he was pulling out of his wallet at any given time—his own or the state party one—and somehow it always seems to have been the state party one. Rubio's apparent financial incompetence almost makes you want to give him the benefit of the doubt and wonder if it's not so much that he's lying about his tax plan as that he doesn't know what he's talking about when he talks about his own plan. (Does that really count as the benefit of the doubt, come to think of it?)
 
Way too many people willing to believe whatever Anonymous puts out there (and some things they don't), as though they think this group doesn't have its own agenda. No amount of elite cyber security can protect against lies, and as soon as someone "innocent" finds themselves on a list (as if on a list isn't scary enough) and tries to defend themselves most people will just be like, "Well OF COURSE they're going to deny it." No thanks.
 
My point.

As well the after effects of Whitewater and the perception of everything HRC does is corrupt or scandalous.
 
Wonder what 57 thinks about Robert Byrd, who actually WAS in the KKK. Did you just accept that he'd reformed at face value without questioning it because he had a (D) next to his name?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top