2015 Really !!
- Thread starter 57Brave
- Start date
Tapate50
Well-known member
Oh, I hope against hope that this doesn't peter out anytime soon.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Ummmm what?
Oklahomahawk
Boras' Client
bravesnumberone
Well-known member
Says the guy who posts memes and quotes liberal blogs to make his arguments.
Dalyn
Fredi Gonzalez Supporter
57Brave
Well-known member
well, now we have another fabricated outrage that can't take the light of day
Geez -- you guys are on a roll
For starters, Maybe you should pay more attention to MSNBC or some of the more left leaning blogs for your info.
Or, is it easier to kow-tow to the Kochs , Trump, Rush and Palin
Or, are we not sure? Like some of doubt that the Anonymous above isn't - you know, the real Anonymous
Key Clinton emails did not contain highly classified secrets, inquiry finds
By Josh Gerstein
11/06/15 01:40 PM EST
The U.S. intelligence community has retreated from claims that two emails in Hillary Clinton’s private account contained top secret information, a source familiar with the situation told POLITICO.
The determination came from Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s office and concluded that the two emails did not include highly classified intelligence secrets. Concerns about the emails' classification helped trigger an on-going FBI inquiry into Clinton's private email set-up.
Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III made the claim that two of the emails contained top secret information, the State Department publicly stated its disagreement and asked Clapper’s office to referee the dispute. Now, that disagreement has been resolved in State’s favor, said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Intelligence officials claimed one email in Clinton’s account was classified because it contained information from a top secret intelligence community “product” or report, but a further review determined that the report was not issued until several days after the email in question was written, the source said.
"The initial determination was based on a flawed process," the source said. "There was an intelligence product people thought [one of the emails] was based on, but that actually postdated the email in question."
A top expert in classification procedures called the development " an astonishing turn of events."
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...ail-no-highly-classified-215599#ixzz3qk0a4eFJ
////
Politico, another Clinton Friendly blog --- aye
Geez -- you guys are on a roll
For starters, Maybe you should pay more attention to MSNBC or some of the more left leaning blogs for your info.
Or, is it easier to kow-tow to the Kochs , Trump, Rush and Palin
Or, are we not sure? Like some of doubt that the Anonymous above isn't - you know, the real Anonymous
Key Clinton emails did not contain highly classified secrets, inquiry finds
By Josh Gerstein
11/06/15 01:40 PM EST
The U.S. intelligence community has retreated from claims that two emails in Hillary Clinton’s private account contained top secret information, a source familiar with the situation told POLITICO.
The determination came from Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s office and concluded that the two emails did not include highly classified intelligence secrets. Concerns about the emails' classification helped trigger an on-going FBI inquiry into Clinton's private email set-up.
Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III made the claim that two of the emails contained top secret information, the State Department publicly stated its disagreement and asked Clapper’s office to referee the dispute. Now, that disagreement has been resolved in State’s favor, said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Intelligence officials claimed one email in Clinton’s account was classified because it contained information from a top secret intelligence community “product” or report, but a further review determined that the report was not issued until several days after the email in question was written, the source said.
"The initial determination was based on a flawed process," the source said. "There was an intelligence product people thought [one of the emails] was based on, but that actually postdated the email in question."
A top expert in classification procedures called the development " an astonishing turn of events."
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...ail-no-highly-classified-215599#ixzz3qk0a4eFJ
////
Politico, another Clinton Friendly blog --- aye
57Brave
Well-known member
Let me understand ----
Outrageous unfounded claims and character assassination vs a (D) woman are alright - and actually encouraged
Yet
Outrageous unfounded claims and character assassination vs a (R) man are alright - and actually left to ridicule
??????
Yeah, both sides do it
57Brave
Well-known member
Maybe next week we start on Dr Ben
In case you missed this
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/1...#ixzz3qk0a4eFJ
In case you missed this
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/1...#ixzz3qk0a4eFJ
sturg33
I
Just give it up dude. Hilary's transgressions deserved scrutiny and major attention. Your dumb meme was just a lie.
You're a loser.
sturg33
I
Ahh... so you're making the argument that you intentionally posted a lie in order to prove a point?
lol, you're such a loser
Dalyn
Fredi Gonzalez Supporter
You completely missed the point.
Dalyn
Fredi Gonzalez Supporter
Dalyn
Fredi Gonzalez Supporter
Politico is trying to spin. This only covers two e-mails. There are a lot more than just two that have her in trouble. However, Politico got the response they wanted because there are bozos such as yourself that now believe she's been completely vindicated.