The Don

Any debates between Donald and Hilldog might be the most colossal waste of time in the history of politics. We both know everything Trump says, no matter how outfreakingrageous, his supporters, or just those who hate Hilldog, will scream and support!!! We also know everything Hilldog says, no matter how outfreakinrageous, her supporters, or just those who hate Trump, will scream and support. They could both literally read the phonebook and all anyone will say is how their person is obviously the right choice and the other candidate is totally freaking nuts!!!

Once Trump brings up the debacle of Benghazi, Hillary won't have any come backs. She'll take the knock out punch. If Trump ever brings up the fact that Hillary stands beside a serial woman abuser, she won't be able to deny that one either.
 
Once Trump brings up the debacle of Benghazi, Hillary won't have any come backs. She'll take the knock out punch. If Trump ever brings up the fact that Hillary stands beside a serial woman abuser, she won't be able to deny that one either.

i'm sure she will have an answer to the first part

and if he somehow brought up the 2nd part, it would do so much more harm to him than good but i'm sure the fringe lunatics would love it but that doesn't help ya
 
Once Trump brings up the debacle of Benghazi, Hillary won't have any come backs. She'll take the knock out punch. If Trump ever brings up the fact that Hillary stands beside a serial woman abuser, she won't be able to deny that one either.

I've said this many times already but I guess I'll have to say it a few more times. The Benghazi scandal is only a killer issue if you listen to talk radio and if you listen to talk radio then you're already going to vote for Trump. I realize that Repubs have convinced themselves that they value human life SOOOOOO much that the 4 Americans who died there did no needlessly (which is true by the way) but when they bring it up don't you think Hilldog will bring up the dozen or so embassy attacks with well over 100 casualties that took place under W's (ie Repub) watch? I don't want Hilldog's sorry arse in the White House any more than you do but Benghazi is a losing strategy, as is Bill's sexual infidelity. All that one is going to do is generate sympathy for the "poor cheated on, longsuffering spouse".

Hilldog has plenty of weaknesses, those two aren't where the Repubs need to go.
 
Once Trump brings up the debacle of Benghazi, Hillary won't have any come backs. She'll take the knock out punch. If Trump ever brings up the fact that Hillary stands beside a serial woman abuser, she won't be able to deny that one either.
The general public moved on from those issues long ago.

I really think all Hillary has to do is sit back and watch Trump dig his own grave.
 
Maybe the most important article out there on Trump and it's not even about Trump. Meet Paul Manafort - he turns wolves into sheep and is very good at it. His resume is impressive. And scary.

Ben Carson lobbying for running mate?

522955520-republican-presidential-candidate-donald-trumps.jpg.CROP.promo-xlarge2.jpg
 
5 Facts about Trump:

1) He lies just as much as Hillary if not moreso and much less than Ted Cruz.
2) He is part of the establishment.
3) He is in reality a liberal and if you support Hillary you should probably support the Donald
4) He does not actually have a very good brain
5) He might beat Hillary in the general election.
 
You're right. They just fact check.

They use their version of fact checking to make liberals look better than they are and conservative worse than they are. Their fact checking method is terrible and applied inconsistently dependent upon the left wing bias that site promotes. It would be like if Barack Obama created a website that attempts to fact check his own statements and the statements of his opponents and named it something like factcheck.org or something.

http://www.politifactbias.com/
http://editions.lib.umn.edu/smartpolitics/2011/02/10/selection-bias-politifact-rate/

If you choose to believe that Hillary, who has done all but literally morph into Bernie Sanders these past few months, lies less than the average politician then more power to you. It is a free world. But let's not use politifact as source material in defending her. Nobody should ever take that site seriously.
 
They use their version of fact checking to make liberals look better than they are and conservative worse than they are. Their fact checking method is terrible and applied inconsistently dependent upon the left wing bias that site promotes. It would be like if Barack Obama created a website that attempts to fact check his own statements and the statements of his opponents and named it something like factcheck.org or something.

http://www.politifactbias.com/
http://editions.lib.umn.edu/smartpolitics/2011/02/10/selection-bias-politifact-rate/

If you choose to believe that Hillary, who has done all but literally morph into Bernie Sanders these past few months, lies less than the average politician then more power to you. It is a free world. But let's not use politifact as source material in defending her. Nobody should ever take that site seriously.

Yep. It's that darn liberal conspiracy that's at it again. Cruz's problem in all of this is he's a really smart guy who should know better than to ladle out out-and-out fabrications. He can't use the "I didn't know" excuse.

And who says I believe Hillary? She's the Queen of the Half Truth. Most of her speeches should be used as case studies for rhetoricians.
 
Weso's right on the "fact-checking" - those sites always give me a chuckle. As if there are uninterpreted facts out there. Everything is interpreted and everyone has a bias. Right, left, center, whatever.
 
Weso's right on the "fact-checking" - those sites always give me a chuckle. As if there are uninterpreted facts out there. Everything is interpreted and everyone has a bias. Right, left, center, whatever.

But somehow Politifact won a Pulitzer Prize. Of course, the committee that comes up with those awards is likely stacked with communists.
 
But somehow Politifact won a Pulitzer Prize. Of course, the committee that comes up with those awards is likely stacked with communists.

No, but come on 50, you understand the point. The "fact-checking" thing isn't some pristine, pure, revelation dropped down from heaven either.
 
No, but come on 50, you understand the point. The "fact-checking" thing isn't some pristine, pure, revelation dropped down from heaven either.

No it isn't. But if you go to Politifact, you'll see they hit everybody pretty hard on their BS. It's a legitimate outfit that provides pretty good analysis. It's not the Daily Kos or Drudge.
 
Back
Top