Meme & Quote Thread

It is the exact same thing, man. Both are making fun of disabled people. There's no difference. The only thing that is different is one is done by a conservative and one is done by a liberal. You're just taking up for the liberal. If Obama had done the hand gestures and if Trump said the special Olympics comments you would still be defending Obama. I'm not defending either one of them. They are both wrong.

You did defend Trump

plus
Obama is not a liberal and Trump is not a conservative.

...
edit:
You did not defend Trump
you took up for kgrew
"you are known by the company you keep"
my error
 
Let me follow the line of logic. Paul not accountable for newsletter written in his name
yet
HRC is accountable for what Bill Clinton did in his name

do I have that right ?

Paul is certainly accountable for what was written in his letters... doesn't mean he wrote them. Paul has denied writing them and disavowed them.

And Hilary is accountable for her very regressive response to Bill's womanizing... very little integrity. Hilary has accepted Bill's transgressions and continues to use him as political capital.
 
It is the exact same thing, man. Both are making fun of disabled people. There's no difference. The only thing that is different is one is done by a conservative and one is done by a liberal. You're just taking up for the liberal. If Obama had done the hand gestures and if Trump said the special Olympics comments you would still be defending Obama. I'm not defending either one of them. They are both wrong.

I'm not defending anyone. I don't care for what Obama said, but I put it in a different category than what Trump did. Obama was making fun of himself, albeit in a clumsy and ill-advised way. Trump was making fun or a specific individual and his specific disability. What Obama did was insensitive and unkind. What Trump did was straight-up bullying . . . especially considering that the whole interaction resulted from him being caught in a lie.
 
I'm not defending anyone. I don't care for what Obama said, but I put it in a different category than what Trump did. Obama was making fun of himself, albeit in a clumsy and ill-advised way. Trump was making fun or a specific individual and his specific disability. What Obama did was insensitive and unkind. What Trump did was straight-up bullying . . . especially considering that the whole interaction resulted from him being caught in a lie.

We're just going to have to agree to disagree. I don't see a difference.
 
Paul is certainly accountable for what was written in his letters... doesn't mean he wrote them. Paul has denied writing them and disavowed them.

And Hilary is accountable for her very regressive response to Bill's womanizing... very little integrity. Hilary has accepted Bill's transgressions and continues to use him as political capital.

ok, you admit Ron Paul is responsible for the racism in his newsletters.

Who are you to judge how a husband and wife make their peace?
....

How did they get in a news letter in the first place?
Apparently a congressman from Galveston Texas didn't have time to oversee racist writings attached to his name but we are to trust him with the ship of state ?
This was how both he and his kid lost --- sloppiness combined with a sense of entitlement.

That could be the title of a book on 21st century Republican politics :)
 
ok, you admit Ron Paul is responsible for the racism in his newsletters.

Who are you to judge how a husband and wife make their peace?
....

How did they get in a news letter in the first place?
Apparently a congressman from Galveston Texas didn't have time to oversee racist writings attached to his name but we are to trust him with the ship of state ?
This was how both he and his kid lost --- sloppiness combined with a sense of entitlement.

That could be the title of a book on 21st century Republican politics :)

LOL... I knew that one was coming...

So Ron Paul can't govern because some newsletters that he didn't care about went out.

But Hilary Clinton CAN govern despite her sloppiness with her emails that contained classified info and related to national security.

Just trying to keep up.

It's good to be a leftist!
 
that's the point he didn't take the time to care about them.
or vetting the writer
That is being kind

The emails !!
Still waiting for ... I don't know what are we waiting for ?
Perhaps Karl Rove or Colin Powell or Condi Rice

You never answered what you know about 8" floppy discs.
Shoot, they were tech before you were born

What about Rose Law Firm and I guess you are in the question line over Vince Foster too ?
HRC has been under the microscope for 25+ years.
She has not survived the scrutiny of 25 years by being as sloppy as her critics claim.
Secondly, you never answered who is still under that micro scope that was 25 years ago
No politician and maybe Madonna
ever heard of her ?

yet, all the charges of maleficence and criminality have not once
Never is the word for not once
Never have they come to bear.
Over those 25 years how many times has some sturg asked those same going nowhere questions
"... her sloppiness with her emails " ???/
 
You really do think Obama would mock a disabled person, in public or private?

It's funny. It's really instructive and disturbing to know that someone could see the clip of Trump mocking Serge Kovaleski and not be disgusted.

Defending a bully...that's something to be proud of.

Oh I think it's wrong but I'm not gonna be a hypocrite and act like I'm not an asshole at times. We all are. Trump was wrong but we'l have all done asshat things in our lives
 
that's the point he didn't take the time to care about them.
or vetting the writer
That is being kind

The emails !!
Still waiting for ... I don't know what are we waiting for ?
Perhaps Karl Rove or Colin Powell or Condi Rice

You never answered what you know about 8" floppy discs.
Shoot, they were tech before you were born

What about Rose Law Firm and I guess you are in the question line over Vince Foster too ?
HRC has been under the microscope for 25+ years.
She has not survived the scrutiny of 25 years by being as sloppy as her critics claim.
Secondly, you never answered who is still under that micro scope that was 25 years ago
No politician and maybe Madonna
ever heard of her ?

yet, all the charges of maleficence and criminality have not once
Never is the word for not once
Never have they come to bear.
Over those 25 years how many times has some sturg asked those same going nowhere questions
"... her sloppiness with her emails " ???/

If you could ever post in a comprehensible format it'd be easier to address your nonsense.

It's pretty pathetic that Hilary can barely beat a socialist and probably won't end up beating Donald f'ing Trump... what a joke she is.

And go ahead and scream misogynist to get it out of your system.
 
I did that once when I was 10 and got slapped upside my head. Then I met people that were afflicted.
I was 10 -- Trump is 69 and in the middle of a job interview for the most powerful person on the planet.

Let's go back to the reason/ context of Trump's impression . The writer wrote something critical of Trump.
Trumps response was seen above

As far as Obama ---that notion of Political Correctness seems to be a moving goal post that gets plucked and cherry picked.
 
Oh I think it's wrong but I'm not gonna be a hypocrite and act like I'm not an asshole at times. We all are. Trump was wrong but we'l have all done asshat things in our lives

Sure, I'm an asshole at times. Barely a day goes by that I don't make fun of someone . . . it's just not, typically, a disabled person. I'm willing to cut anyone some slack for one moment of being, you know, human, but with Trump it goes a little further than that.
 
If you could ever post in a comprehensible format it'd be easier to address your nonsense.

It's pretty pathetic that Hilary can barely beat a socialist and probably won't end up beating Donald f'ing Trump... what a joke she is.

And go ahead and scream misogynist to get it out of your system.

Sanders has to win 70% of available delegates remaining and the race was for all intent and purposes over in March.

Tell me about her Foreign Policy speech today.
You keep saying you want to have a meaning full discussion.
I understand she wore orange -
 
Well... he made it very clear how he views the subject in his book.

And like I said - his personal views mean nothing as he would govern based on a constitutional basis.

But your boy wants us to be like Venezuela.

But his personal views mean something as they shape his viewing of the constitution. We've already discussed this ad nauseum.
 
No, I'm saying a healthy part of his viewpoints is the belief in the absence of government.

Correct... so not sure why you're implying that he would use government (which he wants to reduce) to push his personal viewpoints.

I don't know why you keep arguing this. It seems you're out of options and just keep posting nonsense. The fact is Bernie is a moron when it comes to basic economics. That is a real danger to our country.

You can disagree with Ron Paul all you want - and of course his views encourage that - but at least he doesn't use the gun of government to push his views on others... unlike your boy
 
No, I'm saying a healthy part of his viewpoints is the belief in the absence of government.

you say that like it's a bad thing. You want a babysitter, do it on your own time, do not **** with my govt to make it wipe your ass your entire life. Some of us don't want to live that way. Have some personal responsibility and stop being a pathetic, weak, child.
 
Back
Top