Huh? The Indians have a pretty damn good lineup. Kipnis, Ramirez, Lindor, Santana, Naquin is pretty good. They're definitely dangerous.
Kipnis is a career 112 wRC+ hitter; 117 this past year.
Ramirez is a career 100 wRC+ hitter; 122 this past year
Lindor is a career 118 wRC+ hitter; 112 this past year
Santana is a career 124 wRC+ hitter; 132 this past year
Naquin is a career 135wRC+ hitter.
Again, they aren't bad hitters by any mans. They are all above average with Santana being pretty damn good. Naquin is a small sample with a .411 BABIP guy. They are a decent offense that is more depth of the lineup than individual quality.
To compare to Cubs:
Bryant is a career 143 wRC+, 149 this past year.
Rizzo is a career 131 wRC+; 145 this past year
I guess you could possibly throw in Schwarber since he's playing; 132 wRC+
I don't think it's hard to argue that those 3 are better hitters than anything the Indians have; in Bryant/Rizzo, they are much better.
Contreras is a career 126 wRC+ (small sampe)
Zobrist is a career 119 wRC+; 124 this past year
Fowler is a career 110 wRC+; 129 this past year
That is three guys that are just as good, if not better than anyone on the Indians outside of Santana (caveat of Contreras, but he looks good without extreme luck like Naquin) That is now 6 guys listed that are arguably as good or better (if not in same ballpark) than anyone on the Indians outside of Santana.
With the bats of the Cubs and the weakness of the Inidians starting pitchers, I don't believe the Indians are going to bullpen their way through wins like they did in the ALCS. For one, the Cubs have a much better bullpen (and starters, which will shorten the pen) than the Blue Jays. Miller can't throw 15 innings in the series, can he? Also, the rely on Cody Allen and Bryan Shaw a lot and while they did good vs. the Jays, they aren't special pitchers like the Royals had in their pen.