2016 Election Coverage: Aka Every Way You Look at it You Lose.

sturg33 said:
When you don't care who wins bc you know we're ****ed either way... then it is fun
Click to expand...

If you believe in free market economics and it's at or near the top of your priority list, you've have months to digest how ****ty this election would be. I've been hoping she would win while GOP wins Senate and House, we'd get four years of status quo/gridlock, and maybe the Reps would learn their lesson and at least nominate a non-populist next time around to pick off a weak, beatable HRC. It would be satisfying on some level to see the country give an eff you to the establishment, it I'm under no illusions that a Trump presidency would be good for me or the people around me.
 
weso1 said:
Still not sure if a republican win for presidency is good for the pubs or the dems.
Click to expand...

Losing to Trump would almost certainly shock the Democrats out of nominating another Clinton. I'd guess another Obama type would be put front and center like a Booker or someone more charismatic. This election is clearly showing the all flash can win. Trump is all sizzle but no steak, and he's winning against someone who's been working for decades to become president. It's really sad.
 
acesfull86 said:
If you believe in free market economics and it's at or near the top of your priority list, you've have months to digest how ****ty this election would be. I've been hoping she would win while GOP wins Senate and House, we'd get four years of status quo/gridlock, and maybe the Reps would learn their lesson and at least nominate a non-populist next time around to pick off a weak, beatable HRC. It would be satisfying on some level to see the country give an eff you to the establishment, it I'm under no illusions that a Trump presidency would be good for me or the people around me.
Click to expand...

I'm hopeful a Trump wins will shatter the two party system
 
With NC off the table, Clinton can't lose PA, Michigan, or Wisconsin. Michigan it looks like she will win, but Wisconsin is concerning.
 
zitothebrave said:
Losing to Trump would almost certainly shock the Democrats out of nominating another Clinton. I'd guess another Obama type would be put front and center like a Booker or someone more charismatic. This election is clearly showing the all flash can win. Trump is all sizzle but no steak, and he's winning against someone who's been working for decades to become president. It's really sad.
Click to expand...

Whats sad is putting Hillary on the ticket. A slime ball that has worked the system for years to get nominated. America is saying **** THAT. How bad of a candidate do you have to be to lose to a reality tv star? LOL
 
sturg33 said:
I'm hopeful a Trump wins will shatter the two party system
Click to expand...

Might be the only time we agree.

And Hillary supporters can't blame Johnson for this. Trump is outperforming her with or without Johnson in most battlegrounds.

Plus, I don't think any GJ supporters were going to go to her anyways if not go to DT.
 
Trump is now favored to win PA, Wisconsin, and Michigan. Did Hillary bring Dan Kolb in to save the game?
 
See, what did we tell you, Hillary is playing spoiler. She should have dropped out and supported Gary Johnson.

Watching Cenk of Young Turks meltdown is epic. Declaring war on the DNC right now.
 
As [MENTION=266]Hawk[/MENTION] and I have said on here several times before... the GOP better be thankful to Trump that he's actually pulled the party left somewhat.

He's flipping Rust Belt counties like crazy.
 
cajunrevenge said:
See, what did we tell you, Hillary is playing spoiler. She should have dropped out and supported Gary Johnson.

Watching Cenk of Young Turks meltdown is epic. Declaring war on the DNC right now.
Click to expand...

Not so much meltdown, but The Young Turks called this in January.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top