BedellBrave
It's OVER 5,000!
When you post an article from the nytimes you may want to point out that it's basically a propaganda outlet for the dnc.
Bingo. And every site.
When you post an article from the nytimes you may want to point out that it's basically a propaganda outlet for the dnc.
why does it need to be pointed out ?
You either agree or disagree.
Or find parts that make sense to you and others that don't
Seems Wes and Bedell have a solution looking for a problem
or in simple talk
Made up their minds before seeing all the information
Oh, and I despise the Breitbart outfit now, fwiw.
Ask 50 - he's the one who said it needed to be noted. I always assume every site/source is biased. There are no uninterpreted "facts" nor articles or stories written that are neutral.
Have no idea what the rest of your drivel is about.
I have mixed feelings on the current Breitbart outfit. I hate the pandering to the alt right and essentially propaganda for the Trump campaign. I hate that they crap all over conservatives who criticize Trump. I do like that they've attracted a young crowd, a lot of whom aren't actually alt right. And they've done this through humor, which is something I think conservatives have been missing. It's controversial and offensive, but it's fun. I just wish they wouldn't apologize for the alt right and allow them a platform.
While understanding your "note the leaning of your source" caveat, don't we now have to do that with every signal link? I mean really, what outlet hasn't been biased one way or another?
I don't get the hate for the ALT-right. There may be a few bad apples giving the entire faction a bad name, but, as I iterated in another thread, I really do believe that the group is the grassroots future of the conservative movement.
The ALT-right is not Breitbart. The site serves loosely as a legitimizing mechanism for the body, but it's almost universally not the originator of the information it promotes. That's an important distinction to make, IMO. Bannon was smart to cultivate that information. I personally am relieved he was not made Chief of Staff, but have no problem with him in the White House. He's a maverick, sure - but these notions of him being an anti-semite/white supremacist are ludicrous and unfounded. Typical media sensationalism.
I'm still trying to figure out this alt-right term. This is someone that's relatively new to me. Is this like the Breitbart wing of the party or the present day neoconservative?
Does anyone else think Pence may not be thrilled about having to be in charge of the transition? Seems like a hell of a lot of busy work for the VP elect to have to deal with.
He won't be doing much once elected.
Does anyone else think Pence may not be thrilled about having to be in charge of the transition? Seems like a hell of a lot of busy work for the VP elect to have to deal with.