On Friday, a 3 judge panel of the US Court of Appeals in Richmond,Va found the law had a discriminatory effect, but lawmakers did so on purpose.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/court-north-carolina-voter-id-law-targeted-black-voters/
............................................................
read the article(s)
oh yeah, you need bullet points
This is how we got Trump
How can any living, walking, talking adult not have an ID? It's not that hard to get one.
Didn't they need ID to apply for assistance or get a job?
My 98 year old mother surrendered her drivers' license five or six years ago (thankfully). I don't believe she now has the kind of ID many believe should be required to vote.
My 98 year old mother surrendered her drivers' license five or six years ago (thankfully). I don't believe she now has the kind of ID many believe should be required to vote.
Hoping Breyer, Ginsburg and even to an extent Kennedy have the same strength your mother has for the next 4 years.
[video=youtube;vZCVHB68cuY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZCVHB68cuY[/video]
LOL typical liberals... always know what's best for others
Oh, my mother's heart is good, but she's frail. But I don't know about the Supreme Court comparison. She voted. I didn't ask her who she voted for and I doubt she could tell me.
Kr, a lot of poor folks don't have cars and hence, don't have a drivers' license. And every time--almost without fail--a national picture ID is suggested, the privacy advocates come out of the woodwork and kill it.