Give me that old-time (female genital mutilating) religion...

sturg33 said:
Yeah... the millions we have killed... just necessary.

And by the way - if they try to retaliate... we shall deem them animals and kill even more.

That bubble..
Click to expand...

Yeah - We should just sit back and tolerate all they do. That sounds like a great plan.
 
zitothebrave said:
THey'll try to expand, given their resources, they'll get crushed by the bigger players in the area, like China, Russia, Turkey, etc.
Click to expand...

Given their resources like great oceans of gold underneath them? They obviously can't face abother country straight up. That isn't their choice of warfare. But they'll do whatever it takes to obtain nuclear weapons.
 
Sturg,

millions? We aren't Hitler. Say tens of thousands (to bombings) is more accurate. We do kill more of them they do us you have a point there but don't exaggerate.
 
thethe said:
Given their resources like great oceans of gold underneath them? They obviously can't face abother country straight up. That isn't their choice of warfare. But they'll do whatever it takes to obtain nuclear weapons.
Click to expand...

A giant ocean of gold we could easily neutralize with alternative energy sources.
 
AerchAngel said:
Sturg,

millions? We aren't Hitler. Say tens of thousands (to bombings) is more accurate. We do kill more of them they do us you have a point there but don't exaggerate.
Click to expand...

I believe over a million Iraqi's have been killed since the mid-90's... not counting the sanctions that we admitted resulted in the death of half a million children.
 
sturg33 said:
I believe over a million Iraqi's have been killed since the mid-90's... not counting the sanctions that we admitted resulted in the death of half a million children.
Click to expand...

I did not know we sent a nuke over to BOMB them.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, eh? What part of BOMBING did you not see in my post? All deaths not contributed to bombing is inconclusive but if you want to force that in your narrative go ahead. Again, we did not kill over a million with bombs. Read it again, we did not kill over a million people with bombs. Again, we did not kill over a million with bombs. Okay, we got that cleared. Bad water, no medicine, other issues, could have been prevented, so again we did not kill over a million people with bombs.
 
thethe said:
What does that prove? Of course we have killed more. We have technology. That doesn't mean anything when discussing the threat Islam poses to the free world.
Click to expand...

According to Sturg's logic we were the bad guys during WWII because we killed more Japanese than they did us.
 
Garmel said:
According to Sturg's logic we were the bad guys during WWII because we killed more Japanese than they did us.
Click to expand...

I know.

WHO made that estimate and they exaggerate to fulfill anyone who give them any credence for their BS. Since we are the biggest kid on the block with the best gear of course they will make us the scapegoat. Again, that is all circumstance and could have been avoided but some people chose to be human shields if that is the case.

I was talking about direct bombing (put it in parenthesis) and not possible/supposed/estimated/bullsh*t extenuating circumstances but that fell on his normally deaf ears if it fits his agenda.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top