Woman's March

i'm shocked that a eastern europe semi nude model who married for money doesn't have many pictures from a culture that is drastically different than hers

i'm just as shocked by that as i am when i see the sun come back up from the east each morning
 
sturg33 said:
Also - I did a quick google search looking for a pic of Melania wearing a head scarf... unlike HRC and Michelle, I couldn't find one!
Click to expand...

What does that have to do with the price of beans in Mexico. A quick Google search I can find nudes of Melania, Neither are relevant to the meme you posted that you presumed was true without doing the 5 seconds of googling it took me to tear it down.
 
zitothebrave said:
What does that have to do with the price of beans in Mexico. A quick Google search I can find nudes of Melania, Neither are relevant to the meme you posted that you presumed was true without doing the 5 seconds of googling it took me to tear it down.
Click to expand...

AHHHH YOU TORE IT DOWN!!!??? HAVE MERCY PLEASE!
 
Hmm, 24+ hours into facts being brought into this last debate, and no word on if anyone will actually admit they're wrong.

Sad that even on the internet people have to protect their fragile egos.
 
ANd while visiting the Pope, Melania wore a veil, just as every other first lady. OMG WHAT A PIONEER!

I figure maybe only talking like sturg is capable of in this thread is the only way to communicate with him.
 
LOL you are cracking me up my man.

don't take things so seriously.

speaking of which, is anyone ever gonna let me know what right women are denied that men are afforded?

Been waiting on that one for a while.
 
sturg33 said:
LOL you are cracking me up my man.

don't take things so seriously.

speaking of which, is anyone ever gonna let me know what right women are denied that men are afforded?

Been waiting on that one for a while.
Click to expand...

Been waiting on what one for a while? I mean I told you from jump street what rights women were/are fighting for. You don't think they're viable, that's your prerogative, but you don't get to assign a value to what someone else believes.
 
zitothebrave said:
Been waiting on what one for a while? I mean I told you from jump street what rights women were/are fighting for. You don't think they're viable, that's your prerogative, but you don't get to assign a value to what someone else believes.
Click to expand...

I am curious, what rights are they fighting for. To fight in combat? They won that not to long ago. Allow to use men's restrooms? That was lately. Allow to be nekkid in a men's locker room to see how many boners they can count? I think they are still denied that right. They can't be president? Well that can be contested. Oh I know one, they can't prostitute, against the rules. They can rub screw a pole though for men to watch or do a lap dance but that is how far they can take it for money.

Still thinking what RIGHT they don't have that men do. They are even allowed to be medically altered to have penis, might have to pay bit though.
 
AerchAngel said:
I am curious, what rights are they fighting for. To fight in combat? They won that not to long ago. Allow to use men's restrooms? That was lately. Allow to be nekkid in a men's locker room to see how many boners they can count? I think they are still denied that right. They can't be president? Well that can be contested. Oh I know one, they can't prostitute, against the rules. They can rub screw a pole though for men to watch or do a lap dance but that is how far they can take it for money.

Still thinking what RIGHT they don't have that men do. They are even allowed to be medically altered to have penis, might have to pay bit though.
Click to expand...

This post is drivel. I want to see if sturg can use his head. I don't think he can.
 
zitothebrave said:
This post is drivel. I want to see if sturg can use his head. I don't think he can.
Click to expand...

We are talking Rights, correct? Nothing about equality, but you said Rights.

Even googling it produces nothing but rape, pay inequality but nothing about inclusive rights. Heck men should march because they lose on divorces, child custody and what not. Heck some men are paying for children when they weren;t even the father. I guess they can march on that.

But the only travesty out there on Rights is on the men's side......
...they don't have the right to stop a woman from abortion and they are the father of the child. That hurts men that in some cases only have one shot of having a child but they can't force the women to keep the baby.
 
AerchAngel said:
We are talking Rights, correct? Nothing about equality, but you said Rights.

Even googling it produces nothing but rape, pay inequality but nothing about inclusive rights. Heck men should march because they lose on divorces, child custody and what not. Heck some men are paying for children when they weren;t even the father. I guess they can march on that.

But the only travesty out there on Rights is on the men's side......
...they don't have the right to stop a woman from abortion and they are the father of the child. That hurts men that in some cases only have one shot of having a child but they can't force the women to keep the baby.
Click to expand...

1. Men can march on that. But men aren't the ones losing. Men like to paint a picture like they're losing, but that's it, a picture.

2. They don't lose divorces or custody, they're thought out drawn out legal processes. The loss aspect is that oftentimes men are the ones making money in the relationship, because of the innate patriarchal standards. Which is again the reason why jobs men are drawn to pay more than jobs women usually are drawn to. If I were to marry and divorce my girlfriend, we'd have some assets to split but both of us work and earn about the same. Same isn't true of my brother and his wife because he is the main income earner. She spends time at home raising the child. What effectively "losing" on divorce is, is putting a dollar value on child care.

3. Boooo ****ing hoo. A man does nothing when it comes to pregnancy, he shoots a load and the woman and her body does the rest. IF she doesn't want to carry it to term what say should he have? When we can remove the incubated egg with no ramifications to the mother at all and raise it to term in a tube, then he can have a say in it. What's much scarier is that there are men who think they have the right to "spread their seed" by getting women to agree to ahve sex with them with a condom and removing it. Or men who intentionally poke holes in condoms in that same vein.
 
You just proved my point. Women do have a right men can't control or denying but the other way around............

Good luck finding something exclusive to women only.

.....I did find something....women are not allow to be priests. I guess they can "technically" march on that.
 
Oklahomahawk said:
What about the right to get grabbed by the president?
Click to expand...

IF they press for it, he could go to jail, or president getting his knob slob by forcing the female and nothing happens. Not a right, you can ignore it, fight it and since they didn't, they can't march on it. Lewinsky can though .
 
AerchAngel said:
IF they press for it, he could go to jail, or president getting his knob slob by forcing the female and nothing happens. Not a right, you can ignore it, fight it and since they didn't, they can't march on it. Lewinsky can though .
Click to expand...

Didn't he say it was his right to do it? Not sure how that would work in reverse. I do know that women are still paid less in some areas for doing the same job, though some around here won't admit that. I have enough trouble defending my own rights to take on too much of a crusade these days.

Hey, how close did those storms get to you the other night?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top