msstate7
Well-known member
Glasnow's era is 6.97. I'll take the under, but it has to be 5 starts
Looks Like Newcomb Will Get The Call
- Thread starter striker42
- Start date
Glasnow's era is 6.97. I'll take the under, but it has to be 5 starts
Did I say 6.97 ERA, or 4+ ERA? Maybe you should go back and review my post?
Maybe contact that "university" you attended and demand a refund?
GovClintonTyree
<B>Vencer a Los Doyers</B>
I know he often has very good analysis, but has there ever been a room he was in that he did not suck the oxygen out of? Geezus. LOL
I hope you both stick around, but just tone it down a bit. Why does every discussion have to have a winner and a loser (or several as the case may be)?
msstate7
Well-known member
Just emailed state for that refund.
You said lh glasnow, so I assumed you were using him era
Hello? Do we have a bet?
If Newcomb throws 100+ MLB innings of sub-4 ERA ball, I delete my account. If he doesn't reach that inning count or has an ERA over 4, you're gone.
Deal? Or silence?
I predict...silence.
You crossed the line, dick. Get out.
I encourage you to review the thread and see whose post caused the discussion to take this turn. As usual, it wasn't me.
That $4k you spent on that "degree" should buy you a brand new double wide from clv in the south, right?
Yeah. I know... Everyone is always attacking poor Enscheff.
Did you review the thread? Please answer the question and stop deflecting.
I did, and it was clearly you. UNCBlue just started a bet. You singled out another poster entirely with a personal attack.
bravesfanMatt
Steve Harvey'd
That is a horrible bet.. and non predictor of anything. what % of rookie pitchers come in and throw sub 4 era in first 100 innings. I bet you can find several HOF caliber pitchers who struggled their first 100 innings. Maybe say he is more like Folty than Glasnow.
Hey, I'm not the one that challenged someone to delete their account if Newcomb pitched under a 4 ERA. Take the stupidity of that assertion up with the southern twit, UNC.
I have read every post. The fact that you are worried about who started it reinforces my point.
Everyone calm down and discuss the topic without having to make someone a loser.
I hope Newcomb proves you guys wrong. He might not, but I am a fan. I will be watching with interest, and will not declare his career to be over, nor usher him into the HOF based on his performance in his debut. If he does well, I will probably be guilty of over exuberance.
I have read every post. The fact that you are worried about who started it reinforces my point.
Everyone calm down and discuss the topic without having to make someone a loser.
I hope Newcomb proves you guys wrong. He might not, but I am a fan. I will be watching with interest, and will not declare his career to be over, nor usher him into the HOF based on his performance in his debut. If he does well, I will probably be guilty of over exuberance.
Thanks for your effort to return this discussion to rational normalcy. (Not normal normalcy, but rational normalcy.)
I have read every post. The fact that you are worried about who started it reinforces my point.
Everyone calm down and discuss the topic without having to make someone a loser.
I hope Newcomb proves you guys wrong. He might not, but I am a fan. I will be watching with interest, and will not declare his career to be over, nor usher him into the HOF based on his performance in his debut. If he does well, I will probably be guilty of over exuberance.
Because you quoted me when you decided to scold us for arguing. Why didn't you quote the post that caused the thread to branch?
It was yours. It is always yours.
Actually, I just pointing out UNC started the winner/loser conversation, which is precisely what mrfree was referring to.
Did you learn that analysis skill in a southern "university"?