I think several strings of completely nonsensical arguments against points I make are proof positive they do.
Hell, one time Gov resorted to arguing with me over the definition of a word in a desperate attempt to be "right" about something lol.
Double hell, just last night someone argued with me because I said Suzuki received a ball poorly and likely cost Folty a called strike. He then went off on a tangential tirade about Folty giving up a hard hit ball...as if that somehow proved me wrong about Suzuki's framing of a single pitch haha.
Just yesterday, you and Southcrack disagreed with me over Medlen's service time. Then he posted a table that proved he was wrong (which he didn't even realize) and you guys STILL argued against me over it. Post after post you guys argued over a fact you didn't understand.
I could post "the sky is a nice shade of blue today", and someone here would try to disagree using a completely unrelated point as proof...."you idiot, that Camaro over there is even more blue!!".