1) Nah, man. I'm using your own words. You described yourself as pro-Russia. I'm very much anti-Putin, and have made no secret of it, but I'm personally kind of a Russophile going back to my school days, which is neither here nor there. But I've stated numerous times that I am in favor of strategic cooperation with Russia if it makes sense for our national interests.
I'm "pro-Russia" in a diplomatic sense -- but I'm asking you what you think being "pro-Russia" means, and if it's more than a kind of half-assed pejorative label. I've explained myself.
2) Still kinda wondering what the US did that was analogous.
https://academic.oup.com/isq/articl...a-Vote-The-Effects-of?redirectedFrom=fulltext
You don't think US electoral interference in the Ukraine or cyber attacks (like on a nuclear facility) are at all comparable?
How about US interference in the 1996 Russian elections? You don't think that would stick in Volodya's craw?
There's bad blood here.
3) Homes, you did. Repeatedly. Your point of view was that there were no hogs, and even if there had been, turnabout is fair play. You want quotes?
Yes, I want quotes. I asked for quotes the other day. Or links to quotes. Or just some context.
4) like I said, I agree with you about cyber security and cyber awareness, but you've used it as a surrogate for actually addressing what happened.
Which is happening? The 'non-existent' or the 'tepid' version? Help me out.