cajunrevenge
Well-known member
So he is a liar with questionable morals. Sounds like he is qualified for government work to me.
For profit insures what is happening in Britain doesn't
Sturg, compare the wealth of the middle or 4th quintile to to that of the top quintile and, more instructively, to the top 1% over the last 4-5 decades. That's a good place to start.
Sturg, compare the wealth of the middle or 4th quintile to to that of the top quintile and, more instructively, to the top 1% over the last 4-5 decades. That's a good place to start.
[tw]949801685953798144[/tw]
Fantastic
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016...ts-94-all-new-jobs-under-obama-were-part-time
If anyone cares to read this article you might be surprised to learn that Obamas job growth was not all that impressive.
I don't think the website zero hedge lived up to their name this time. It was not 94% worth of PT jobs. It was alternative work, which includes things such as contract work where you work for one firm and are sent to another business. Many of those jobs are FT hours.
Corporate layoff announcement was lowest its been since 1990.
But 57 and goldy can keep telling us that things haven't changed
To parrot 57, if you have a point to make, make it.
I went through this over several pages in another thread. The 3rd, 4th, 5th, quintiles are stronger today, while the lower two are weaker today.
No matter how you slice it, that's good. While it may be true that the "middle" quintile has shrunk, it's 100% because people have gotten richer. In what world is this a bad thing?
The only way you can complain about this is if you support equal outcomes, and at this point I'm not certain that you don't so please go ahead and clarify
Care to compare the rate of growth over time amongst those groups?