HRC

The statute specifies "knowingly and with intent," which is hard to prove, which is why most prosecutors aren't eager to take these cases on unless they're really strong, there is some kind of intent judged to be malicious, and/or clear intent to deceive.

I originally thought you quoted the piece about government employees dealing with classified information.
 
You're concerned about an FBI official's wife's political financing. You're not concerned about Trump's personal finances or aid to his campaign from whomever. Got it.

We are already investigating that and no smoking gun has popped up. Maybe 2018 is that year!
 
I should say the same to you in that you avoid the truth in HRC. Why did the foundation money dry up after she lost?

One reason is that they cut a bunch of programs and scaled back the entire organization was in expectation of Hillary becoming President. Oops.

I don't know the "truth in HRC." I simply don't think she's a homicidal mafia boss, like you apparently do.
 
One reason is that they cut a bunch of programs and scaled back the entire organization was in expectation of Hillary becoming President. Oops.

I don't know the "truth in HRC." I simply don't think she's a homicidal mafia boss, like you apparently do.

Yeah and she needed to get that foreign money in as fast as possible?

So if that's the reason why did they stop all the good work they did after she didn't win?
 
Also, it goes way further than HRC. The fact she didn't win means all of these things that were being covered up will now get investigated. That is a risk to many things such as the Iran deal. I believe, and feel free to call me crazy and all the things that you've been doing lately, but we are going to see a worldwide network of dirty dealings that have been swept under the rug by the Obama administration. What is happening in Europe and America is a threat to what was believe to become the new world order and the scrambling to come up with fake news and fake Russia collusion conspiracies is a method to divert the publics attention and a last gasp effort for their dirty secrets not be revealed to the world.
 
But again - a fire that happens to have been on the anniversary of Seth Richs murder is just yet another coincidence in a string of coincidences under the Clinton name.
 
The statute specifies "knowingly and with intent," which is hard to prove, which is why most prosecutors aren't eager to take these cases on unless they're really strong, there is some kind of intent judged to be malicious, and/or clear intent to deceive.

There are additional rules when it comes to classified information:

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

It states:

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

And that is why the changing of the language by Peter S was so damning to the FBI's integrity that you want to defend passionately. HRC blatantly violated this statue and should be in jail today. She put the whole country at risk.
 
Can't wait for "sorry we can't fulfill that subpoena request because the records were destroyed in a freak fire" excuse. Can we all agree if that happens there's something fishy going on?
 
Can't wait for "sorry we can't fulfill that subpoena request because the records were destroyed in a freak fire" excuse. Can we all agree if that happens there's something fishy going on?

HRC is more brazen than that. She will just destroy it and shrug her shoulders. I mean when she destroyed evidence the last time nothibg bad happened to her so why not this time?
 
Cyrus Toulabi

‏ @CyrusToulabi

21h21 hours ago

DOJ IS INVESTIGATING THE CLINTON FOUNDATION...

To see if they ACCEPTED DONATIONS.

To gain ACCESS to and INFLUENCE over HILLARY.

She's no longer in office.

TRUMP ORG charges MEMBERS OF MARALAGO...$200K.

To gain ACCESS to and INFLUENCE over TRUMP.

The current U.S. President.


220px-John_Kerry_official_Secretary_of_State_portrait.jpg


John Kerry

Sec of State 2013-2017

get a grip boys
 
Yeah...you definitely want us not to investigate HRC. I don't blame you. It's going to get real bad for her real soon.
 
[tw]949671049897103360[/tw]

It's really so obvious to anyone who isn't a complete shill for the Clinton's
 

Pay for play is obvious with the Clinton foundation. Once that gets proven each claim in the Clinton cash book will be fully nvestigated and I suspect some of that will tie back directly to the Obama administration. That is why the media is in all out attack mode and releasing of fake news. This is going to come back to Obama at some point.

If and when it's proven that the Clinton foundation was nothing more than a pay for play it's just a stone throws away from the worst president of all time.
 
Back
Top