HRC

Julio3000 said:
Concern about optics and perceptions of their conduct? How does that indicate that anything was actually done wrong?

Whatever. Go get the next predigested bit of glop that's being regurgitated by the helpful mother birds at the propaganda mills and we'll rinse and repeat.
Click to expand...

I mean you just said you're OK with unequal justice. That's fantastic your true colors are showing.
 
Julio3000 said:
Concern about optics and perceptions of their conduct? How does that indicate that anything was actually done wrong?

Whatever. Go get the next predigested bit of glop that's being regurgitated by the helpful mother birds at the propaganda mills and we'll rinse and repeat.
Click to expand...

Your entire case against Trump is optics
 
thethe said:
I mean you just said you're OK with unequal justice. That's fantastic your true colors are showing.
Click to expand...

Paul Manafort is chilling in his mansion under house arrest while there are people who are sitting in jail because they can't get bond for some petty bull****. There are a zillion inequities in our justice system. Acknowledging them is not the same as condoning them.

I can also acknowledge the reality of the political sensitivity of that investigation (and Mueller's). It's IMO kinda thick not to.
 
Julio3000 said:
Paul Manafort is chilling in his mansion under house arrest while there are people who are sitting in jail because they can't get bond for some petty bull****. There are a zillion inequities in our justice system. Acknowledging them is not the same as condoning them.

I can also acknowledge the reality of the political sensitivity of that investigation (and Mueller's). It's IMO kinda thick not to.
Click to expand...

Acknowledging the inequities of the justice system and supporting them are two completely different things and your conflating of the two is a weak sauce attempt at backtracking a statement you know was awful.
 
thethe said:
Acknowledging the inequities of the justice system and supporting them are two completely different things and your conflating of the two is a weak sauce attempt at backtracking a statement you know was awful.
Click to expand...

You're trying to tell me that investigators talking to each other, acknowledging the reality of the politically sensitive situation they're in (talking optics but not, notably, pulled punches) is not par for the course? If you want to make a case that it alone represents unequal justice, whatever.

Probably the exact same reason Strzok wasn't hot to join the OSC.
 
Julio3000 said:
You're trying to tell me that investigators talking to each other, acknowledging the reality of the politically sensitive situation they're in (talking optics but not, notably, pulled punches) is not par for the course? If you want to make a case that it alone represents unequal justice, whatever.

Probably the exact same reason Strzok wasn't hot to join the OSC.
Click to expand...

I don't need to make a case. It's snack right in front of us.
 
Hillary has been a fraud her whole life. Laughing about getting sexual predators off, calling black men super predators and embracing KKK lords.
 
As the article says she could benefit from a crowded field of contenders. I think she could beat anyone but Bernie in the primaries.
 



If there is anyone here dumb enough to think they werent selling access and favors with their foundation then I have a bridge to sell you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top