Well, perhaps you could read up on executive privilege and witness tampering.
But no, no one in handcuffs.

Well, perhaps you could read up on executive privilege and witness tampering.
But no, no one in handcuffs.
Seb Gorka
Guns
Hungary
Interpol
Buzzfeed
BIG
Want to try to rationalize telling witnesses what they can and can't answer without invoking executive privilege?
Huh? Is that what you believe happened?
I'm interested in hearing your case for 'witness tampering'.
[tw]954083561350553600[/tw]
I can't wait!
Just like I can't wait for Trump to finally show the proof of the hundreds of accusations he's made on Twitter where he says he's got evidence but then quietly never does anything about it.
I can't wait!
Just like I can't wait for Trump to finally show the proof of the hundreds of accusations he's made on Twitter where he says he's got evidence but then quietly never does anything about it.
This is BIG
Well considering the evidence supporting collusion from the left far outweighs the Trump campaign I wouldn't be quick to mock new evidence popping up. I mean you could choose to keep having convulsions on blatant fake news. BUH BUH BUH RUSSIA!
But like I said, I'm much more interested in the witness tampering accusation.
The basic definition is not difficult to understand unless you like to practice mental gymnastics like Trump supporters generally do.
On what planet?
Well you have ZERO evidence of collusion with Russia for the Trump campaign.
However, we have evidence the Obamas justice department got an unverified dossier from Russian sources that was also paid for in part by the HRC campaign. So despite how not finalized that is we already have more REAL evidence of collusion with the boogeyman Russia agents than Trumps campaign has.
Lol.
Mental gymnastics?
Dude, you are sitting here claiming (with zero evidence) that the White House counsel instructed Bannon's attorney to withhold testimony.
Zero evidence?
Have you bothered to even read the reports on Bannon's testimony?