Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)
- Thread starter Runnin
- Start date
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
Ima guess it was stuff like this:
PS: wasnt is cool when i killed the Hlry case?
LP: fukn sweet, honeybunny
PS: the president (pbuh) is gone and w him our hopes & draems. Wut to do now?
LS: lets do a conspiracy on Trump
PS:allahu akbar
Cute jokes coming from a place where you realize your whole thought process for the last 2 years was fraudulent
RELEASETHEMEMO
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
You still haven't told me what Peter Strzok did to undermine the the Mueller investigation. Not the public perception of it via MAGA twitter . . . but what did he actually DO?
Well for starters he let the ladies off on the HRC investigation. He edited Comeys original memo to make sure HRC didn't get in trouble.
Then he was one of the lead interrogators for Flynn. With his obvious bias I'm sure he was very professional in that setting. You can expect Flynns indictment to be thrown out after all this is over .
But I don't even think that PS is about the Trump ivnestigation. That part will be solved once they show that the Dossier was the lead and potentially only piece of evidence used to get the FISA warrants. When that happens then the probe will be finished.
Eventually it will lead to many members of the Obama administration in handcuffs.
57Brave
Well-known member
sturg33
I
130 crumbs?
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
Well for starters he let the ladies off on the HRC investigation. He edited Comeys original memo to make sure HRC didn't get in trouble.
First, that's wrong on a number of levels. Nobody "let the girls off." I explained why, and showed my work. Whatever he did or didn't do, he did not and could not do it on his own.
But what does that have to do with Trump?
Then he was one of the lead interrogators for Flynn. With his obvious bias I'm sure he was very professional in that setting. You can expect Flynns indictment to be thrown out after all this is over .
I'm still missing the malfeasance here. Did he falsify evidence or something? Or maybe was he was just in the room when Flynn lied.
But I don't even think that PS is about the Trump ivnestigation. That part will be solved once they show that the Dossier was the lead and potentially only piece of evidence used to get the FISA warrants. When that happens then the probe will be finished.
That is an entirely different tune than you were singing before.
First, that's wrong on a number of levels. Nobody "let the girls off." I explained why, and showed my work. Whatever he did or didn't do, he did not and could not do it on his own.
But what does that have to do with Trump?
Then he was one of the lead interrogators for Flynn. With his obvious bias I'm sure he was very professional in that setting. You can expect Flynns indictment to be thrown out after all this is over .
I'm still missing the malfeasance here. Did he falsify evidence or something? Or maybe was he was just in the room when Flynn lied.
But I don't even think that PS is about the Trump ivnestigation. That part will be solved once they show that the Dossier was the lead and potentially only piece of evidence used to get the FISA warrants. When that happens then the probe will be finished.
That is an entirely different tune than you were singing before.
No this is not a different tune. I have said many times that I believe the Doisser was used to get the FISA warrant. This was after the Dossier was pimped out by the left for months. Then once its contents became clearly created and exaggerated they backed off its importance knowing how bad it was that it was used for the FISA warrant. Enter Papa BS story. When it comes out that this was used you can say goodbye to this whole investigation.
In regards to 'letting the girls off' - PS was the interrogator. We have evidence that Mills/Abedin lied under oath. We know now that PS changed the language of Comeys letter to have it fall beneath the federal crime statute. These are all facts. And now we know why he may have had that done. Did he have all the power? No, but I think we are seeing a web of deceit within the FBI/DOJ that had clear interests in clearing Hillary and getting Trump. What those reasons are and why they risked it all for Hillary damn Clinton is what is going to be the interesting question for the next few years while we enjoy America being released from the Shackles of the Globalist rule
None yet - This is just what I believe.
Not sure what the legal ramifications are for falsifying information to the FISA courts though. That should be interesting.
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
No, you're singing a different tune about the import of the Strzok texts.
I think it's funny that one of the texts that you're waving around now is the dude saying he doesn't want to be part of the SC investigation. I get that it is potentially a statement about the quality of the case that was there, and that's a worthwhile point, but it completely undermines your fundamental idea that there is a cabal of FBI baddies champing at the bit to take Trump down.
FWIW, it's easy to understand not being jazzed about being on the investigation if you were a careerist. Way too much downside, especially if you didn't think the case was strong enough.
And you once again blew past the point of the Mills/Abedin thing. There is no such evidence.
I think it's funny that one of the texts that you're waving around now is the dude saying he doesn't want to be part of the SC investigation. I get that it is potentially a statement about the quality of the case that was there, and that's a worthwhile point, but it completely undermines your fundamental idea that there is a cabal of FBI baddies champing at the bit to take Trump down.
FWIW, it's easy to understand not being jazzed about being on the investigation if you were a careerist. Way too much downside, especially if you didn't think the case was strong enough.
And you once again blew past the point of the Mills/Abedin thing. There is no such evidence.