Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

nsacpi said:
He didn't hack FB. He is a whistleblower. All of the data was acquired in compliance with FB policies at the time (which in and of itself says something). The problem was FB's incredibly lax policies in checking whether the data was shared with third parties, and subsequent cavalier attitude in verifying whether the data was destroyed by those third parties.

Imo FB is the worst actor in this entire matter. And that's saying a lot given how badly some of the other parties have behaved. FB was even threatening the Observer with legal action as they were getting their story ready.
Click to expand...

Yeah, whatever other revelations come out of this, we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that Facebook is turrible.
 
DYp5_UPVAAA6P2q.jpg:large
 
Can someone get me up to speed on what the latest accusation is?

Are we still on treason or collusion or vote rigging or misuse of campaign funds or something else

This is a serious question... what is Trump going down for?
 
sturg33 said:
Can someone get me up to speed on what the latest accusation is?

Are we still on treason or collusion or vote rigging or misuse of campaign funds or something else

This is a serious question... what is Trump going down for?
Click to expand...

witch huntin without a permit
 
I just love the idea of continually throwing nonsense in the media machine to keep this as a story so people are thinking about it during the mid terms. Don't kid yourselves...that's the only reason this is being brought up. This story is going no where.
 
thethe said:
Is Cambridge now a part of the Trump campaign? What's the actually story here?
Click to expand...

It is a set of small details that might have escaped your attention. But:

1) Before the recent news, Cambridge Analytica had already received a subpoena for records from Mueller

2) Brad Parscale (I can explain to you who he is if the name is not familiar) hired Cambridge Analytica to help with the Trump campaign.

It may be that there are no dots to be connected. Or maybe there are. I'm sure we will find out in due course.
 
In a broadly reported press release from Cambridge Analytica, Nix is quoted as saying "We are thrilled that our revolutionary approach to data-driven communication has played such an integral part in President-elect Trump's extraordinary win,” but, when later reports started to critique the company's technique, Nix was quoted in March 2017 by the New York Times saying: “We bake a cake, it’s got 10 ingredients in it. Psycho-graphics is one of them.”

From the article I linked a few posts up.
 
The maybe it's no dots but we are going to find out has been uttered by you maybe 100 times. No dots have been found since.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top