i disagree. ERA measures what happened, but not necessarily pure performance. a guy can have a great game with a 4.5 ERA or a poor game with a 1.29 ERA.
Honestly, I didn't even think anyone used bWAR anymore for pitchers.
i disagree. ERA measures what happened, but not necessarily pure performance. a guy can have a great game with a 4.5 ERA or a poor game with a 1.29 ERA.
Honestly, I didn't even think anyone used bWAR anymore for pitchers.
i feel like WAR in general is weird for pitchers
It's a weird construct. But I like Fangraphs process more. Give credit to fielders for what they do and give credit to pitchers for what they can control (mostly). The truth likely lies in between the two versions.
And oh my God it's not Newcombe!! Drives me crazy for some reason.
fWAR didn't hate folty lasf night... 0.4 to 0.5
bWAR hates it... 0.7 to 0.3
Yeah ERA blew up. fwar is all about the walks, k's, and homers.
Which stat accounts for things like exit velocity? Folty was getting laced all night
Which stat accounts for things like exit velocity? Folty was getting laced all night
xwOBA. It went up from 0.316 to 0.330
xwOBA is the expected version of wOBA based on batted ball profile - this article talks about wOBA, but wOBA and xwOBA interpreted pretty much the same, just calculated differently because xwOBA is fielding independent: https://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/woba/
http://m.mlb.com/glossary/statcast/expected-woba
I do expect a pitcher WAR that is xwOBA based with walks and strikeouts to crop up soon. It's truly fielding independent and makes too much sense not to have it.
Folty 0.9 fWAR and Newk at 1.0 fWAR.
I just don't understand why thethe doesn't like Folty. He's exactly what he liked about Newk last year. Damn near 11 K/9 even with the high walk rate.