Within the context of the argument you are trying to advance, this distinction doesn't hold water at a number of levels.
I'm stunned. It's apparent you, julio, et all hold this opinion whenever an argument doesn't fully agree with yours
First, speech or rhetoric is surely a type of action. And one that can be very consequential.
OK. Sure. When Trump starts saying people shouldn't have rights, etc. I'll start paying a lot more attention. As it stands, he typically says things like "Janet Yellen isn't tall enough to be fed chairman"... that makes him sound like an idiot, sure. But nobody is dying here or losing rights. Can you show me otherwise?
Second, we have a president who has backed up his rhetoric with very specific actions and policies. The Muslim travel ban. Seperating children from their parents.
Sure. I didn't/don't agree with the Muslim ban. I don't agree with separating families. But these aren't actions against Americans are they?
Third, I'm not so sure one party to a relationship splitting from the other over Trump (an action) is much different from that party continually haranguing the other instead (which technically I suppose is rhetoric). It seems to me if anything that the former is a more mature and reasonable reaction..
Um... OK... Trump doesn't affect the lives of these women. He seriously doesn't. And, if you read the article - which I suppose you didn't - the women make it clear that their husbands didn't even support Trump... they just don't hate him enough in their view.
Seriously... how sad is that a woman - who marches about how strong willed and not emotional she is - let's a dude she's never met end her marriage.
Finally, while not saying that Trump is as bad as Hitler, it does seem to me at some point it is worth ending relationships over politics. And people of principle did do that during such times. Nazi Germany and the Civil War come to mind. One of the union generals in the Civil War was George Henry Thomas. From Virginia. His family never talked to him again after his choice to stay loyal to the union. They didn't even attend his funeral. I'm sure he was aware of the breach that was likely to occur when he made his choice..
Whoa, Trump's not as bad as Hitler??? How brave of you to say.
You're right... there's a point where supporting a monster is worth ending a relationship over. Has Trump started rounding up the Jews and killing them? No? Oh.
Has he chained up black people? No? Oh (side note, I remember biden promising us that Romney would!)
Has
any American's lives been actually impacted by Trump that is new from our standard? If so, could you point out where?
I mean... I'm old enough to remember when Barack Obama deported more hispanics than any President in our country's history. I'm old enough to remember when Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act, which allows the US government to detain US citizens without trial or due process. I'm old enough to remember when Obama decided he could, and did, assassinate an American citizen without due process. I've recently learned that Obama's CBP used tear gas on migrants on a monthly basis. I remember when Obama separated migrant children from their families. I remember when Obama didn't bother with a Muslim ban, but instead droned more innocent muslim civilians to death than any president in our history.
But he's a statesman whom we all love, remember? Trump is mean on twitter damnit!!!
Does indeed to appear that way