Heyward
<B>Voted Worst Poster <br>'13, '14, '15 (Co-Winner
[TW]1073008370997579777[/TW]
Wonder who the Nats have lined up?
I've seen them mentioned in on Keuchel, and other SP's. But they'd want a RP, SP, and a 2B.
[TW]1073008370997579777[/TW]
Wonder who the Nats have lined up?
gonna off myself[TW]1073012971549351941[/TW]
[TW]1073012971549351941[/TW]
[TW]1073012971549351941[/TW]
Braves assistant GM says that it doesn’t make sense to go all in for one specific year...
This is old and pisses me off as a fan. I’m excited about a good farm system because we can get whoever we want. We have money to spend on FAs....
I want to see the ATLANTA Braves win...not the Mississippi Braves....
If you aren’t willing to go all in, there is no reason to sign Donaldson
Braves assistant GM says that it doesn’t make sense to go all in for one specific year...
This is old and pisses me off as a fan. I’m excited about a good farm system because we can get whoever we want. We have money to spend on FAs....
I want to see the ATLANTA Braves win...not the Mississippi Braves....
If you aren’t willing to go all in, there is no reason to sign Donaldson
This is true, but who was left available late last year? Mous and......? Great news if a team needed a 3B, not so great if they needed an OF.
I don't think waiting around for an OF to be sitting there in late January is a very smart plan for a team just entering their window of contention.
Again, if the signing of JD forces AA to wait until January to sign Markakis because he couldn't afford Brantley/Cutch in December, the JD contract was a mistake and AA misread the cOF market.
I highly doubt it has anything to do with Harper or anyone like him. However, it is at least a little bit intriguing AA is meeting with Liberty executives. I don’t recall a Braves GM doing that since Liberty took over.
So AA said signing a FA with a pick attached to them isn’t a problem and then Pollock was mentioned. I wouldn’t mind him at all in RF.
[TW]1073003624437936129[/TW]
Harper to Atlanta confirmed
I'd rather have Brantley... I can't imagine he'd be more expensive and Pollock actually had a long history of being injury prone. Brantley does not... he just had the one big injury that took a long time to come back from.
I'd rather have Brantley... I can't imagine he'd be more expensive and Pollock actually had a long history of being injury prone. Brantley does not... he just had the one big injury that took a long time to come back from.