Big if true.
[TW]1087806907191123969[/TW]P
[TW]1087806907191123969[/TW]P
Big if true.
[TW]1087806907191123969[/TW]P
well i'm a hoarder (when it comes to prospect capital) so i am good with this
well i'm a hoarder (when it comes to prospect capital) so i am good with this
well i'm a hoarder (when it comes to prospect capital) so i am good with this
Obviously we need to donate some of those to Marlins for JTR.
Only fair to spread the wealth.
I don't think his signing particularly prevents them from doing anything that people were talking about yesterday.
well it almost definitely stops the pursuit for an upgrade at corner OF. it's bench money, but is he going to be our bench guy? i doubt it.
the problem isn't the money, it's the fact that you've essentially downgraded the corner OF spot from last year when you had the resources to upgrade it. without another big move in the pipeline, this isn't good.
How is it a downgrade if you have the same exact player???
which is smarter, McCutchen at 3 years 50M or Nick at 1 year 4M with option and buyout? remember McCuthen hit .255 with 20 homers last season Markakis hit .297 with 14 Homers. I'll take Nick when looked at in that light
Because nobody expects Neck to have the same type of season. So yeah if Neck performs like he did from 15-17 with the Braves or like he is projected to play in 2019 then it will be a downgrade from his 2018 performance. The main difference is this year he should actually be a good value with his contract.
The real unknown is how much worse Markakis will be in 2019 than 2018.
I'd much rather risk 6m and no commitment on the chance of Markakis being a 1.5-2 Win player than on betting on 3 years of McCutchen at 16m per.
Particularly since the amount of money committed to Markakis does not prevent them from signing or trading over him.
If McCutchen were to flame out the Braves would not have much flexibility to obtain an external upgrade.
I'd probably have done the Brantley deal though.