Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

nsacpi said:
you're right...the mueller letter to barr says nothing....I've fallen for fake news again...bad me
Click to expand...

Mueller did not disagree with barrs statement. What is there to argue over?

Mueller did not find evidence to support collusion/conspiracy.

What the hell are we even talking about anymore?
 
i love that nothing happened at all and somehow on that same line he and his disciples will also utter why didn't President Obama do anything when Russia did something


and they don't see how those clash at all
 
thethe said:
Mueller did not disagree with barrs statement. What is there to argue over?

Mueller did not find evidence to support collusion/conspiracy.

What the hell are we even talking about anymore?
Click to expand...

You are so far from an objective observer that your comments are satire.

Read the Report. Mueller found tons of collusion and conspiracy but not what he felt rose to the level of "criminal". Most of the conspiracy was between Wikileaks, Russia and various peripheral characters. But that doesn't mean that there was no collusion.
 
"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office's work and conclusions. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation."

----Mueller to Barr
 
Sen Chris Van Hollen: Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion?

Attorney General William Barr: I don't know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion.
 
nsacpi said:
"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office's work and conclusions. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation."

----Mueller to Barr
Click to expand...

I love repeat posts... here's another

"When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not"
 
sturg33 said:
The Washington Post article that broke this "this is BIG version 4,687 story"
Click to expand...

yes...and if you read the article you might be able to answer my question...who do they attribute this claim to:

"When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not"
 
Looks like Mueller will be testifying before House Judiciary later this month. We will be able to hear from the man himself.

And hopefully McGahn will also soon be testifying in public.
 
Last edited:
nsacpi said:
Looks like Mueller will be testifying before House Judiciary later this month. We will be able to hear from the man himself.
Click to expand...

Good.

We can have endless "wait for the testimony" speculation like we had "wait for the full report" like we had "wait for the report conclusions" like we had...


Can't wait to see the next cling after that
 
thethe said:
Mueller did not disagree with barrs statement. What is there to argue over?

Mueller did not find evidence to support collusion/conspiracy.

What the hell are we even talking about anymore?
Click to expand...

Well, this is what we are talking about:

"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature and substance of the Office's work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the Department on the morning of March 25. Now there is public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation... "
 
sturg33 said:
It is crazy what you guys will fall for. Making Alex Jones seem normal. Thought yall might have learned from the last 10,000 times but here we are again

[Tw]1123372754273742848[/tw]
Click to expand...

who would keep believing a guy who has already been caught lying multiple times? why haven't you learned?
 
nsacpi said:
Looks like Mueller will be testifying before House Judiciary later this month. We will be able to hear from the man himself.

And hopefully McGahn will also soon be testifying in public.
Click to expand...

GOP can only hold it up so long.
i wonder why they'd want to hold it up at all?!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top