Liberalism bans factual language
[Tw]1143119327815766016[/tw]
Down goes Jefferson.
The term owner is not banned by the NBA. They use the term governor instead, but Silver has specified it’s simply terminology the league uses and prefers, not something that’s mandated.
Re: Betsy Ross flag...
TLHLIM
Lincoln was a racist who suspended the writ of habeus corpus, one of the most evil acts ever done by a president. Yet no one ever talks about that.
I find the selective treatment of history kind of ridiculous.
if only a liberal state would have banned the name i guess it would have made it here
or if liberals were angry about a mermaid being portrayed by a black actor got them upset
it might have made it here
Dude nobody gives a **** about little mermaid. The left always does this, they find like 3 random twitter accounts of a complaint then they say the GOP is outraged. Its absurd.
With regards to the burger, I understand the logic. Like, for example, I can't sell sugar pills and label them as cancer curing pills"
I'm not sure if I agree with the government regulating it, but you can extend the logic elsewhere where it makes total sense.
Dude nobody gives a **** about little mermaid. The left always does this, they find like 3 random twitter accounts of a complaint then they say the GOP is outraged. Its absurd.
With regards to the burger, I understand the logic. Like, for example, I can't sell sugar pills and label them as cancer curing pills"
I'm not sure if I agree with the government regulating it, but you can extend the logic elsewhere where it makes total sense.
[Tw]1147480262307192832[/tw]
This is pretty much exactly what you do.
I’m not sure I follow. I can see why you can’t call veggie protein “beef,” but I don’t see why you can’t call it a burger. It seems to get to some abstruse metaphysical pondering about what a burger or a hot dog is. I mean, a hot dog isn’t a dog, is it? The example you’re using is not a good analogy, as it’s making an unsubstantiated claim about health benefits, which is clearly a no-no.
I’d also think this was a pretty clear call from a libertarian perspective, and it’s obviously speech policing—and, unlike almost everything else in this thread, it’s being done by the government.