The Coronavirus, not the beer

And now these polls that have historically been underscoring trump's approval are now showing that a majority of americans approve of the president's job during the chinese virus.

It's like the people on this board are completely out of touch.
 
thethe said:
The virus is much less deadly than originally thought. Probably another war tactic by china. However it didnt stop anyone from questioning and trying to destroy the economy.

Well hey...it hurts trump so why not.
Click to expand...

500k - 1M dead under this "rosy" prediction. Are you okay with that?
 
thethe said:
And now he would be as bad as Xi if he had the chance.
Click to expand...

I didn't say that; who knows what Trump would do then, but we do know now that he is an amoral walking Dunning-Kruger case study. Also, one of his deficiencies is vast incompetency. Xi is much more efficient add doing things, good or bad.
 
Metaphysicist said:
500k - 1M dead under this "rosy" prediction. Are you okay with that?
Click to expand...

Nothing rosy about understanding the death rate amd why its overstated now.

I think the range will be 100-200k.

That sucks a lot but people die every day.

A depression, which the communists here want, would cause more devastation.
 
Metaphysicist said:
I didn't say that. One of his deficiencies is vast incompetency. Xi is a much more efficient add doing things, good or bad.
Click to expand...

Efficiency?

Hahahaha

How about the fact he is an authoritarian ruler that gets to do anything he wants without any resistance.

Jesus what is wrong with you
 
And this was your statement...

"The limits placed on the office of the President constrains his ****tiness in a way that the "constitution" of China does not constrain Xi"

So, yeah meta. You did say exactly that.
 
thethe said:
The denominator is severly understated. Therefore death rate is severely overstated.
This is just a simple fact based on all information we have.
Click to expand...

This all accounted by the article you shared which still indicates 500k-1M deaths for us. Why do you want to genocide the elderly?
 
thethe said:
Efficiency?

Hahahaha

How about the fact he is an authoritarian ruler that gets to do anything he wants without any resistance.

Jesus what is wrong with you
Click to expand...

Yes, that the definition of efficiency. I didn't say it was good. In fact, I explicitly used the word "bad." Have you completely lost reading comprehension?
 
thethe said:
And this was your statement...

"The limits placed on the office of the President constrains his ****tiness in a way that the "constitution" of China does not constrain Xi"

So, yeah meta. You did say exactly that.
Click to expand...

This is a statement on constitutional structure that I can't imagine you disagree with. Please read.
 
Metaphysicist said:
Yes, that the definition of efficiency. I didn't say it was good. In fact, I explicitly used the word "bad." Have you completely lost reading comprehension?
Click to expand...

You completely switched your original point that said trump would do it if he could bit is limiting by the constitution.

Then you realized how ****ing insane that statement was and then tried to change it.
 
thethe said:
You completely switched your original point that said trump would do it if he could bit is limiting by the constitution.

Then you realized how ****ing insane that statement was and then tried to change it.
Click to expand...

Let's go to the tape, which mind you was specifically rebutting Runnin's claim that Trump was as bad or worse than Xi:

Donald Trump is possibly the single most worthless person alive (I cannot think of even a single positive quality he possesses), but he has not done as much bad stuff as Xi. The limits placed on the office of the President constrains his ****tiness in a way that the "constitution" of China does not constrain Xi.

Shorter: He is worthless and constrained. No specific predictions on what he would do.

I'd guess: definitely more ****ty things than currently allowed, but unlikely to efficiently maximize per capita ****tiness of Xi or have the same goals. But who knows. Please learn reading comprehension.
 
thethe said:
What is it then?
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top