Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

what happened to "exoneration "

You remind of the 9th inning the home baseball team with a 1 run lead insists on playing a 10th inning

maybe that "exoneration" was built on the same sand everything else this game show host touches
 
"probably" infers one is interjecting their opinion on a topic.
As in ,had Acuna hit 3 HRs in the last game the Braves "probably" would have won- Folty threw a no hitter
--- or some other such nonsense

If I am not mistaken, Steele was expelled from Moscow ( you can look up why) a few years before being contracted to compile this dossier.
Do we have to go over and remind again just what a dossier is? And what purpose it serves

.......

At which point it is the readers responsibility to understand things like inference and when they are reading it

#exoneration
 
Speaking of Durham, wasnt his report due months ago? Or as I predicted is the report never going to be released until after the election so they can keep convincing the crazies that he has something juicy.
 
thethe said:
[Tw]1248734850514853890[/tw]

I'd look into charges against Schiff. How could he have told the American public there was nothing wrong with the FISA process?
Click to expand...


1. On what charge



2. How ****ing stupid do you have to be to think a highly partisan person like Barr has the legal basis to charge Schiff and chooses not to.
 
Julio3000 said:
Yeah, that's what I don't really get about the denialists here.

Even without accepting any inferences about the origin of the email and with full disclaimers that it doesn't by itself prove complicity in actual deeds, I don't know why this shouldn't be considered a big deal.

Junior got presented with an opportunity to cooperate with Russians to bring out dirt on HRC. He basically said "Hells yeah! Let's talk about timing" and cc's Manafort and Kushner.

Hawk says because one of the intermediaries is a goof who's clearly on the Bowman fitness plan, we shouldn't pay attention. Thethe says conspiracy and wants to shrink the bullseye to subatomic size.
Click to expand...

Remember back in 2017 when it was a conspiracy for the FBI and CiA to do what they did?

Wow
 
thethe said:
Maybe it's because I don't see a difference between someone like Russia and an entity like the NYT or MSNBC. I see these as global players trying to wield influence but we are all fine with the dems working lock and step with these entities.
Click to expand...

Nailed this in 2017.
CONSPIRACY.
 
Julio3000 said:
MSNBC and NYT want to maximize shareholder value. Since they're elements of entities subject to US law, they have to do so within some fairly narrow strictures. You may not like their editorial slant but that's another conversation. Russia, as currently constituted, wants to promote their national interests and enrich and aggrandize their ruling class, particularly while undermining the norms and institutions of democracy. They are not subject to the same strictures.

So, thethe, I'm not sure how well they compare.
Click to expand...

You were right. They seem bg to be worse than Russia now kicking the boots of the CCP.
 
[Tw]1248954753893236736[/tw]

How is Watergate worse than this? It's small potatoes compared to what Hussein did.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top