The Coronavirus, not the beer

I'm gonna punch you in the face, dude. Shut the **** up with this. 7000 people in NYC have died in a month. The flu normally kills 2000 in a whole year.

It spreads incredibly faster.

We have seen quite a bit that's proven this. In terms of impact by total infection I think we might find oit it's closer than anyone thought.
 
It spreads incredibly faster.

We have seen quite a bit that's proven this. In terms of impact by total infection I think we might find oit it's closer than anyone thought.

Then its not the ****ing flu; shut the **** up about people not dying. A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE DYING DIP****.
 
i love that republicans now want to use per capita type arguments

when every other time they reject it lol

where have i rejected the use of per capita?

(leaving aside the "republican" nonsense"

Sorry to post data that doesn't paint the orange man as bad as the eurozone
 
40% of the population has not tested positive for antibodies. That's not the dataset of the Chicago study. It also tells us nothing about the virus being here in October.

Yes....it shows in an area such as Chicago you could expect 40% or at least should bot be surprised.

For NY...much higher. Therefore you had a flu season condensed to one month because everyone got infected.

So take the emotion out of your geography and realize what we are dealing with.
 
And just a wonderful demonstration of how you are a moron. 40% infection in Chicago (made up) = the virus has been here since October. Hugh death total in one month in NYC = actually the virus just spreads really fast.

Go become a hare krishna or something. That's a much healthier cult, dude.
 
And just a wonderful demonstration of how you are a moron. 40% infection in Chicago (made up) = the virus has been here since October. Hugh death total in one month in NYC = actually the virus just spreads really fast.

Go become a hare krishna or something. That's a much healthier cult, dude.

Yeah...all those factors actually make sense with eachother. What dont you understand since you've been wrong an incredible amount of times this far.

Even that alex berenson tweet you mocked actually was kind of true based on backdating when antibodies were present.

You just dont seem.to understand exponetional growth.

Dont teach that in law school I guess.
 
I'm just mad because you promised to stop saying death rates were low a week ago. And the death rates are much worse now. And you are still saying this ****.
 
I'm just mad because you promised to stop saying death rates were low a week ago. And the death rates are much worse now. And you are still saying this ****.

Death rate is super low now that we know the denominator is very large. I guess math is off limits.
 
Drive through testing. It's about as random as you get aside from using a ring.

Incredible you are dismissing this fantastic finding.

It's drivethru testing... at a hospital... where the sick people go... I seriously can't believe you think that is random sampling.
 
I will readily admit at least 15% of NYC has likely been infected at this point. That seems undeniable unless the virus has had a bizarrely high fatality rate here.

But if 40% of Chicago has been in infected, and that has resulted in ~400 deaths, that same infection:death ratio would make 200+% of the population of NYC infected. Seems unlikely.
 
It's drivethru testing... at a hospital... where the sick people go... I seriously can't believe you think that is random sampling.

It's not all sick people. And it doesnt say that anywhere in the article. You are literally making **** up now because you know you're wrong.

Healthy people are getting tested because of the hysteria problem like you are spreading.
 
Back
Top