The Coronavirus, not the beer

Its cute that you are 'ignoring' me bit still reference me.

You must hate it how stupid you were this whole time
 
thethe said:
Thise concerned are not knowledgeable on the facts.

Sucks when so many are brainwashed by media and their own political bias.

The data has been clear for almost 2 months now
Click to expand...

Except just a little over a month ago, you said this wouldn't even kill 20k people... even if you buy the over counting nonsense, we still have WAY more deaths than that... so yeah, real clear data there.
 
zbhargrove said:
Except just a little over a month ago, you said this wouldn't even kill 20k people... even if you buy the over counting nonsense, we still have WAY more deaths than that... so yeah, real clear data there.
Click to expand...

I've said lots of things.

Most.of which were right.

It could be worse. I could have Metas record on this topic.
 
thethe said:
As long as thise deaths were fake and resulting from incompetence.
Click to expand...

I said 50 to 60 thousand to account for your false death nonsense... even if if your false death crap were true, there's no way they could get away with fudging it more than a few thousand... you were easily off some 50 to 60 thousand people in a month. Real clear.
 
zbhargrove said:
I said 50 to 60 thousand to account for your false death nonsense... even if if your false death crap were true, there's no way they could get away with fudging it more than a few thousand... you were easily off some 50 to 60 thousand people in a month. Real clear.
Click to expand...

Yeah...no way could we code deaths as COVID when it wasn't the contributing factor.
 
thethe said:
Yeah...no way could we code deaths as COVID when it wasn't the contributing factor.
Click to expand...

You keep trying to misdirect because you know that a month ago, you were incredibly wrong about this thing. A massive discrepancy to what you said would happen and what has happened... even if you do account for your over counting opinion. Misdirection and flashy/unnecessary adjectives and adverbs litter your arguments to try and make up for their lack of quality content.
 
What would the death count be if we actually protected those at risk?

Would we even have 50k deaths at this time?
 
zbhargrove said:
You keep trying to misdirect because you know that a month ago, you were incredibly wrong about this thing. A massive discrepancy to what you said would happen and what has happened... even if you do account for your over counting opinion. Misdirection and flashy/unnecessary adjectives and adverbs litter your arguments to try and make up for their lack of quality content.
Click to expand...

you're just going to pretend the nursing home policy wasn't a massive failure and unnecessarily inflated the death count?

Really?

Should I have baked into my assumptions that we would have sacrificed old people?
 
thethe said:
What would the death count be if we actually protected those at risk?

Would we even have 50k deaths at this time?
Click to expand...

Trying to argue with hypothetical situations, opinions, Twitter headlines, and selective cherry-picked data... that's your whole strategy.
 
thethe said:
you're just going to pretend the nursing home policy wasn't a massive failure and unnecessarily inflated the death count?

Really?

Should I have baked into my assumptions that we would have sacrificed old people?
Click to expand...

No, you should just man up and admit you were wrong. Its not hard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top