2020 Field

57Brave said:
No comments on for instance, Jim Jordan? Yet ...

at the risk of playing Mr Obvious, another prominent woman of color draws your attention
////////////

That makes 3 in under 24 hours
you sir are on a roll
Click to expand...

You draw the race card like a gun. It cheapens you. You might realize that nothing I've said about these people is incorrect.

As for Jim Jordan, where was he brought here?

Also, your ability to selectively read what only you want is astounding. I also noted how I specifically went out and voted against the crazy Qanon supporter running for Congress down here. But that doesn't fit your narrative so it's ignored.

You are engaging in a classic logical fallacy of the ad hominem, by the way. You have no argument against my position so you resort to attacks on my character. It makes your position weaker.

Omar's issues are well known. She's paid her husband's consulting firm a HUGE amount of money. While not illegal, it is unethical. If it comes out he's getting paid without rendering services, it becomes illegal. She needs to do better.

For the record (and you'll ignore this because it doesn't fit your narrative), I think Newt Gingrich buying his own books with donor money to give out as campaign material was also unethical.
 
She just re won nomination in her district by almost 2-1. Which was originally my point before you weighed in.
Apparently the people she represents dont share your concerns.
I believe she, like Talib and AOC, was outspent by a great deal where no doubt her ethics were an issue. There will still be a general where again (R) will question her ethics .
It is odd how these 3 women agree with them or not garner so much attention from RW media. Not to mention the corporate wing of (D).
Yet from the same people Jordan gets a pass.

You did find time to negativly write about 3 women of color in less than 24 hours.
I guess it could have neen coincidental.
You deserve the benefit of the doubt
 
striker42 said:
You draw the race card like a gun. It cheapens you. You might realize that nothing I've said about these people is incorrect.

As for Jim Jordan, where was he brought here?

Also, your ability to selectively read what only you want is astounding. I also noted how I specifically went out and voted against the crazy Qanon supporter running for Congress down here. But that doesn't fit your narrative so it's ignored.

You are engaging in a classic logical fallacy of the ad hominem, by the way. You have no argument against my position so you resort to attacks on my character. It makes your position weaker.

Omar's issues are well known. She's paid her husband's consulting firm a HUGE amount of money. While not illegal, it is unethical. If it comes out he's getting paid without rendering services, it becomes illegal. She needs to do better.

For the record (and you'll ignore this because it doesn't fit your narrative), I think Newt Gingrich buying his own books with donor money to give out as campaign material was also unethical.
Click to expand...

He won't see anything he doesn't want to. It is always the same with him.
 
thethe said:
[Tw]1293284370317541376[/tw]
Click to expand...

Was pulling for Tulsi to get the VP nod, as I think Biden winning is almost a shoe in unless the economy turns around in 2 months and Tulsi is the better candidate. Kamala isn't terrible from a strategic standpoint as she is much younger than Biden Trump, and Pence and she'll help garner the AA vote, but she didn't fare to well during debates and does have some baggage that Tulsi doesn't.
 
Last edited:
Carp said:
Was pulling for Tulsi to get the VP nod, as I think Biden winning is almost a shoe in unless the economy turns around in 2 months. Kamala isn't terrible from a strategic standpoint as she is much younger than Biden Trump, and Pence and she'll help garner the AA vote, but she didn't fare to well during debates.
Click to expand...

Kamala is about the worst pick possible. Anyone picked would have been disliked by trump voters but there is a significant portion of the left that dislikes kamala as well.

Economy is already improving and Biden is getting worse by the day. Couple that with a great picture of what a leftist run government looks like in Portland and Seattle and Chicago and new york and well i could name several more but yiu get the poiny. By election time you'll think its a shoe in for trump to win.
 
Carp said:
Was pulling for Tulsi to get the VP nod, as I think Biden winning is almost a shoe in unless the economy turns around in 2 months and Tulsi is the better candidate. Kamala isn't terrible from a strategic standpoint as she is much younger than Biden Trump, and Pence and she'll help garner the AA vote, but she didn't fare to well during debates and does have some baggage that Tulsi doesn't.
Click to expand...

I could dang sure get on board with Tulsi.
 
thethe said:
Kamala is about the worst pick possible. Anyone picked would have been disliked by trump voters but there is a significant portion of the left that dislikes kamala as well.

Economy is already improving and Biden is getting worse by the day. Couple that with a great picture of what a leftist run government looks like in Portland and Seattle and Chicago and new york and well i could name several more but yiu get the poiny. By election time you'll think its a shoe in for trump to win.
Click to expand...

Trump chances are dwindling by the day. The swings he barely won in 2016 are all heavy Biden leans. Way more so than they were for HRC at the same time. Even Florida is showing a 4-5 point lean for Biden currently. If Trump doesn't win FL, he doesn't have much hope for winning PA or Michigan. And without those states, he has zero chance of winning.
 
Carp said:
Trump chances are dwindling by the day. The swings he barely won in 2016 are all heavy Biden leans. Way more so than they were for HRC at the same time. Even Florida is showing a 4-5 point lean for Biden currently. If Trump doesn't win FL, he doesn't have much hope for winning PA or Michigan. And without those states, he has zero chance of winning.
Click to expand...

I agree that if the election were held today it would look grim for trumps chances. Good thing we have almost 3 months to go and Biden might not be able to say his name before that time is up
 
57Brave said:
She just re won nomination in her district by almost 2-1. Which was originally my point before you weighed in.
Apparently the people she represents dont share your concerns.
I believe she, like Talib and AOC, was outspent by a great deal where no doubt her ethics were an issue. There will still be a general where again (R) will question her ethics .
It is odd how these 3 women agree with them or not garner so much attention from RW media. Not to mention the corporate wing of (D).
Yet from the same people Jordan gets a pass.

You did find time to negativly write about 3 women of color in less than 24 hours.
I guess it could have neen coincidental.
You deserve the benefit of the doubt
Click to expand...

The spotlight the right shines on The Squad is ridiculous. I've long been annoyed with the amount of time the right spends on them. Ultimately they're just extremely junior members of congress.

Hypocrisy is sadly common in politics and one of the reasons I'm an unaffiliated voter these days and why it will probably continue into the future.

I also don't think what I said about Kamala Harris was negative. I don't see being skilled at playing political games being automatically a bad things. It's a skill and a skill is not inherently bad. If she uses her ability to effectively play the cards she's dealt for good ends then it's a good thing.

I do think she was a bad choice for VP but only because she doesn't bring much to the ticket that makes Biden more electable. Biden carries California with or without her, she's not in with all the big donors, and she had some baggage in her past (the Willie Brown stuff). Maybe they're trying to set her up to run in 2024 with Biden not seeking re-election due to age. That's about all I can think of.
 
bunch of new state polls from CNBC/Change Research:

credibly accused creepy joe up 4 in Pennsylvania

credibly accused creepy joe up 5 in Michigan

credibly accused creepy joe up 4 in Wisconsin

credibly accused creepy joe up 6 in Florida

credibly accused creepy joe up 1 in Arizona

very poorly chosen one up 1 in North Carolina
 
Compared to this time in 2016...

Trump is performing better in battleground polls (0.4%)

Biden is performing better in general election polls (0.5%)

Trumps favorability is up 3.8%
 
Brian Klaas
@brianklaas
·
3h
There's a lot I like about the Harris pick, but one thing isn't

getting enough attention: Trump demands absolute loyalty.

He forces people to stroke his ego. Harris came out swinging

at Biden and landed a big blow in the primary.

Biden responded by asking her to govern with him.
 
57Brave said:
Brian Klaas
@brianklaas
·
3h
There's a lot I like about the Harris pick, but one thing isn't

getting enough attention: Trump demands absolute loyalty.

He forces people to stroke his ego. Harris came out swinging

at Biden and landed a big blow in the primary.

Biden responded by asking her to govern with him.
Click to expand...

she also said she believes Tara Reade, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top