GDT: 11/3/20, Election Day, Donald J. Trump vs. Joseph R. Biden

Status
Not open for further replies.
California really needs to be broken up into 3 states of which I assume atleast 1 would go red. I think this is the compromise that should be made to allow DC a d PR to become states.... or atleast PR.
 
cajunrevenge said:
California really needs to be broken up into 3 states of which I assume atleast 1 would go red. I think this is the compromise that should be made to allow DC a d PR to become states.... or atleast PR.
Click to expand...

California ain't gonna break up unless Texas also breaks up.
 
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-supp...-runoffs-when-system-rigged-1550938?piano_t=1

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Frustrated supporters of President Donald Trump in Georgia challenged Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel on why they should even vote in the upcoming Senate runoffs if "rigged" elections are "already decided."
...

"Why should we vote in this election when we know it's already decided?" asked one demoralized Marietta voter.

...

McDaniel was hit with a barrage of questions directly pertaining to Trump's ongoing accusations of voter fraud, which he has extended to several other states, including Michigan and Pennsylvania, where he lost by tens or even hundreds of thousands of votes. Trump supporters present at the event appeared apathetic about the upcoming vote, saying the expansion of "money and work when [the election] is already decided" seems pointless.
Click to expand...

This is the best case of, you live by the sword (Trump's ridiculousness), you die by the sword. GOP is finding this out the hard way.
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...lection-2024-biden-inauguration-b1763221.html


Trump reportedly considering holding an event to announce his 2024 bid on the day of Biden's inauguration. Pretty sure I called that one. I probably said the next day but close enough. The thing is I dont think he will officially announce because that makes him subject to a bunch of campaign finance laws. I think this is a legal defense strategy for Trump. He will try and claim immunity because he is a candidate. Yeah I know candidates dont have immunity but he tries anything and everything to see what sticks. When NY goes after him he will try and paint it as election interference. If the DoJ goes after him he will compare it to what he tried to do to Biden. If Trump can make it to 2024 he has a good chance to win since Biden is so stupid he thinks he can hug it out with Republicans. Trump tried to get him arrested with nothing and Biden doesnt want to prosecute Trump who is up to his eyeballs in legal trouble. How ****ing weak can one person be. Just gets down on all fours and let Republicans **** him in the ass because he is worried they will think he is too mean.
 
If Northern California were a separate state, it'd be a red state for sure. You're not going to get any questioning from me on that (and probably anybody else) and in fact, it's traditionally been a red area anyway for years (I haven't done heavy research on this but I have looked at previous results and they skew republican).

California as a whole however, loooool at the idea that upwards of millions of votes are off. Thinking so is purely nutty. If we're in a world where that is the case, then yes, arrest everybody involved, but chances that this is the case? Not likely.

In fact, they tried to go after the votes in California in 2016 and came up with nothing then.
 
I see Democrats all over the place saying "how could Trump get 70+ million votes". Its really simple. It comes down to marketing. When the economy was improving under Obama Republicans branded it the "slowest recovery in history" and when the economy continued at the same pace under Trump they branded it "built the greatest economy the world has ever seen". These phrases have been said a million times over media and every time its said Democrats just give a deer in headlights look when they have a chance to respond. A whole lot of people take that silence as admitting what the person is saying is right. That alone imo is the difference between 10-15 million votes. Biden also did this disastrous deer in headlights look when Trump went on a short rant about being "smart" in the debates. That was like a man with a water pistol beating a man with a bazooka because they guy with the bazooka just stood there and did nothing. If there was any topic Biden should have been well prepared for to attack Trump on it should have been intelligence.
 
[tw]1332773294001573892[/tw]


The corruption and waste of tax money as much as they can before getting kicked out
 
Anne Applebaum
@anneapplebaum
·
6h
Amazing contrast between the bravery of ordinary Belarusians who protest,

week after week, against an election that really was stolen - and the profound

cowardice of elite Republicans who cower, hide from the press and refuse to

concede after losing an honest election.
 
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahshahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Who could have seen this bull**** coming?

[tw]1332493415439732736[/tw]
 
[tw]1332920839235399681[/tw]

Only a fool thinks this was an honest election.

Trump won in a landslide and it will prove to me the case once all the fraud is unwound.
 
cajunrevenge said:
California really needs to be broken up into 3 states of which I assume atleast 1 would go red. I think this is the compromise that should be made to allow DC a d PR to become states.... or atleast PR.
Click to expand...

I still say DC should get swallowed into a state. Either MD or VA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
thethe said:
[tw]1332920839235399681[/tw]

Only a fool thinks this was an honest election.

Trump won in a landslide and it will prove to me the case once all the fraud is unwound.
Click to expand...


[tw]1332920841970061315[/tw]

If this is the type of analysis leading to his assessment, I can understand why he’s confused. Trump gets 35% but it’s impossible to win if Biden doesn’t get 60+%. Unless the understanding is that 3rd Party candidates got 5+% of the remaining vote, Biden would be over his own 60% figure.

He also spends a great deal of time discussing how weird it is that PA, MI and WI veered from OH and IA, just before mentioning exactly how it was possible. There is no population center like Milwaukee, Philly or Detroit in IA or OH. He claims it’s suspicious that these cities turned out in high numbers, but we just went through several months of civil unrest in two of those three cities. I don’t see how you can go through this year and not find it plausible that major cities would be more engaged in the process and have a greater turn out, especially with increased access to voting through mail-in ballots and early voting expansion.
 
Last edited:
mqt said:
[tw]1332920841970061315[/tw]

If this is the type of analysis leading to his assessment, I can understand why he’s confused. Trump gets 35% but it’s impossible to win if Biden doesn’t get 60+%. Unless the understanding is that 3rd Party candidates got 5+% of the remaining vote, Biden would be over his own 60% figure.

He also spends a great deal of time discussing how weird it is that PA, MI and WI veered from OH and IA, just before mentioning exactly how it was possible. There is no population center like Milwaukee, Philly or Detroit in IA or OH. He claims it’s suspicious that these cities turned out in high numbers, but we just went through several months of civil unrest in two of those three cities. I don’t see how you can go through this year and not find it plausible that major cities would be more engaged in the process and have a greater turn out, especially with increased access to voting through mail-in ballots and early voting expansion.
Click to expand...

The magnitude of the increased turnout is almost a statistical impossibility. That is the only counter and if it’s truly the reason then the Democrats should WELCOME a full audit. Why that isn’t happening is all you need to know.
 
thethe said:
The magnitude of the increased turnout is almost a statistical impossibility. That is the only counter and if it’s truly the reason then the Democrats should WELCOME a full audit. Why that isn’t happening is all you need to know.
Click to expand...

I don’t think you can very accurately make this claim given the entirely different circumstances of this year’s election. It’s just as unlikely that an unpopular incumbent increases his vote count the way he did, yet here we are.
 
thethe said:
[tw]1333096208307458049[/tw]

This is going to end badly for the left and the Democrat party.
Click to expand...

Ask yourself, if this opinion is supported by actual evidence, why would the President’s legal team not present it in court? Do they want to lose the election?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top