GDT: 11/3/20, Election Day, Donald J. Trump vs. Joseph R. Biden

Status
Not open for further replies.
zbhargrove said:
Does that mean Hunter Biden gets the same benefit of the doubt?
Click to expand...

In what possible way when there are mountains of evidence showing Hunter Biden profited from his father while good old Joe remained on a visible periphery? I know you don’t consider that laptop even real so I should just pull back.
 
zbhargrove said:
No, he didn't just call for an audit. But you know this already.

[TW]1335305701132910593[/TW]
Click to expand...

Remember when The NY Times said they had a senior level source and it turned out to be a cabinet staffer?

Don’t expect anyone to believe unnamed sources anymore
 
sturg33 said:
You thinking that an anonymous source = fact is pretty on brand
Click to expand...

Oh look

You took a totally different scenario

Then applied it to a different convo

And then tried to pass the 2 separate convos off as the same conversation


Just so you know, this is why you’re a fraud
 
[tw]1335331233706856448[/tw]

Audits reveal everything. Here is your “evidence”. Hundreds of thousands and maybe millions of wrongly accepted votes nationwide.
 
thethe said:
[tw]1335331233706856448[/tw]

Audits reveal everything. Here is your “evidence”. Hundreds of thousands and maybe millions of wrongly accepted votes nationwide.
Click to expand...

Kinda easy to just gloss over the fact that the judge still said the data was inconclusive regarding any fraud and dismissed the case. Keep trying.
 
Ok, I dont think disqualifying ballots because the signatures arent exactly the same is going to give you the result you want unless they specifically only look at Blue counties. Lets see if 85 year old Trump supporters signatures match up. I think you might be surprised.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Ok, I dont think disqualifying ballots because the signatures arent exactly the same is going to give you the result you want unless they specifically only look at Blue counties. Lets see if 85 year old Trump supporters signatures match up. I think you might be surprised.
Click to expand...

It’s always been about the electors not awarding their votes. It’s clear the count isn’t reliable based on the flooding of the zone with at best questionable ballots and at worst fraudulent.
 
zbhargrove said:
Kinda easy to just gloss over the fact that the judge still said the data was inconclusive regarding any fraud and dismissed the case. Keep trying.
Click to expand...

Irrelevant as we now know that potentially tens of thousands of votes in This AZ region are illegal.

Could be millions nationwide.
 
And now we know why the establishment is pushing so hard against a signature audit in Georgia instead pushing a completely irrelevant recount so the rubes think the election was kosher.


Believe the data. Stop the steal.
 
Last edited:
cajunrevenge said:
Ok, I dont think disqualifying ballots because the signatures arent exactly the same is going to give you the result you want unless they specifically only look at Blue counties. Lets see if 85 year old Trump supporters signatures match up. I think you might be surprised.
Click to expand...

In addition the majority of trumps vote was in person so this argument is pretty worthless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top